PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZDIVX vs. NEIMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZDIVX vs. NEIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zacks Dividend Fund (ZDIVX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZDIVX achieves a 8.87% return, which is significantly lower than NEIMX's 17.46% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ZDIVX having a 10.63% annualized return and NEIMX not far behind at 10.35%.


ZDIVX

1D
-0.29%
1M
2.27%
YTD
8.87%
6M
8.97%
1Y
21.72%
3Y*
16.62%
5Y*
9.48%
10Y*
10.63%

NEIMX

1D
0.14%
1M
3.98%
YTD
17.46%
6M
17.48%
1Y
34.72%
3Y*
19.62%
5Y*
11.97%
10Y*
10.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZDIVX vs. NEIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZDIVX
Zacks Dividend Fund
8.87%15.24%16.03%4.36%-2.11%25.17%-0.56%24.88%-6.01%16.20%
NEIMX
Neiman Large Cap Value Fund
17.46%18.68%13.50%6.15%-5.16%23.85%-5.97%23.49%-9.76%19.00%

Correlation

The correlation between ZDIVX and NEIMX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.91

The correlation between ZDIVX and NEIMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZDIVX vs. NEIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZDIVX
ZDIVX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ZDIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZDIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZDIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
ZDIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZDIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

NEIMX
NEIMX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
NEIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
NEIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZDIVX vs. NEIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zacks Dividend Fund (ZDIVX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZDIVXNEIMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.63

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

6.03

-2.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.48

25.19

-13.72

ZDIVX vs. NEIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZDIVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is lower than the NEIMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZDIVX and NEIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZDIVXNEIMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

3.41

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.02

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.03

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.03

+0.56

Drawdowns

ZDIVX vs. NEIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZDIVX drawdown since its inception was -35.27%, smaller than the maximum NEIMX drawdown of -92.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZDIVX and NEIMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZDIVXNEIMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.27%

-92.94%

+57.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.93%

-5.75%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.07%

-92.94%

+78.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.18%

-92.94%

+75.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.27%

-92.94%

+57.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-88.97%

+88.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.90%

-10.52%

+6.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

1.37%

+0.48%

Volatility

ZDIVX vs. NEIMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Zacks Dividend Fund (ZDIVX) is 2.41%, while Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX) has a volatility of 2.65%. This indicates that ZDIVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZDIVXNEIMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.41%

2.65%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.47%

7.77%

-0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.75%

10.18%

-0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.53%

576.30%

-562.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.23%

407.62%

-391.39%

ZDIVX vs. NEIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZDIVX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than NEIMX's 1.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZDIVX vs. NEIMX - Dividend Comparison

ZDIVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, more than NEIMX's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEIMX
Neiman Large Cap Value Fund
0.65%0.76%1.10%1.36%3.60%17.65%1.20%2.26%1.20%6.64%10.20%4.19%
ZDIVX
Zacks Dividend Fund
3.40%3.70%5.88%6.01%6.32%3.97%2.81%2.51%6.66%3.30%1.59%2.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZDIVX and NEIMX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEIMX has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to ZDIVX (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZDIVX dropped -35.27% vs NEIMX's -92.94%.

NEIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZDIVX and NEIMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer