ZDIVX vs. LSVVX

Last updated Jul 22, 2026

ZDIVX (Zacks Dividend Fund) and LSVVX (LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, ZDIVX returned 10.46%/yr vs 10.82%/yr for LSVVX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ZDIVX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for LSVVX.

Performance

ZDIVX vs. LSVVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zacks Dividend Fund (ZDIVX) and LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund (LSVVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZDIVX achieves a 11.96% return, which is significantly lower than LSVVX's 18.33% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ZDIVX having a 10.46% annualized return and LSVVX not far ahead at 10.82%.

ZDIVX

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 2.20%
• 6M: 10.39%
• YTD: 11.96%
• 1Y: 20.52%
• 3Y*: 15.62%
• 5Y*: 10.76%
• 10Y*: 10.46%
• ALL TIME*: 9.70%

LSVVX

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 2.20%
• 6M: 16.84%
• YTD: 18.33%
• 1Y: 34.07%
• 3Y*: 15.36%
• 5Y*: 10.95%
• 10Y*: 10.82%
• ALL TIME*: 7.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZDIVX vs. LSVVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ZDIVX Zacks Dividend Fund	11.96%	15.24%	16.03%	4.36%	-2.11%	25.17%	-0.56%	24.88%	-6.01%	16.20%
LSVVX LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund	18.33%	19.63%	3.97%	12.19%	-4.02%	28.57%	-3.46%	25.29%	-11.10%	16.18%

Correlation

The correlation between ZDIVX and LSVVX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015	0.95

The correlation between ZDIVX and LSVVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ZDIVX vs. LSVVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZDIVX

ZDIVX Risk / Return Rank: 80
ZDIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
ZDIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
ZDIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
ZDIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
ZDIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

LSVVX

LSVVX Risk / Return Rank: 95
LSVVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
LSVVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
LSVVX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
LSVVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
LSVVX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZDIVX vs. LSVVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zacks Dividend Fund (ZDIVX) and LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund (LSVVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZDIVX	LSVVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	3.07	-0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	4.40	-1.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.56	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.96	5.49	-2.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.09	20.90	-9.81

ZDIVX vs. LSVVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZDIVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is lower than the LSVVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZDIVX and LSVVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ZDIVX vs. LSVVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZDIVX drawdown since its inception was -35.27%, smaller than the maximum LSVVX drawdown of -61.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZDIVX and LSVVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZDIVX	LSVVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.27%	-61.62%	+26.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.93%	-6.23%	-0.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.07%	-24.61%	+10.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.18%	-24.61%	+7.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.27%	-40.61%	+5.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.10%	-0.65%	-0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.86%	-12.12%	+8.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.85%	1.63%	+0.22%

Volatility

ZDIVX vs. LSVVX - Volatility Comparison

Zacks Dividend Fund (ZDIVX) and LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund (LSVVX) have volatilities of 2.16% and 2.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZDIVX	LSVVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.16%	2.07%	+0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.49%	8.20%	-0.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.85%	11.17%	-1.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.45%	15.83%	-2.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.17%	18.41%	-2.24%

ZDIVX vs. LSVVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZDIVX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than LSVVX's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZDIVX vs. LSVVX - Dividend Comparison

ZDIVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, less than LSVVX's 11.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LSVVX LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund	11.57%	13.69%	2.45%	6.57%	5.41%	3.67%	2.40%	21.48%	3.91%	1.98%	2.37%	2.38%
ZDIVX Zacks Dividend Fund	3.31%	3.70%	5.88%	6.01%	6.32%	3.97%	2.81%	2.51%	6.66%	3.30%	1.59%	2.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZDIVX and LSVVX in my portfolio?

ZDIVX and LSVVX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ZDIVX or LSVVX?

ZDIVX has higher volatility (2.16%) compared to LSVVX (2.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZDIVX dropped -35.27% vs LSVVX's -61.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LSVVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.