ZCS.TO vs. DXV.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about BMO Short Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZCS.TO) and Dynamic Active Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (DXV.TO).
ZCS.TO and DXV.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZCS.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the FTSE Canada Short Term Corporate Bond Index. It was launched on Oct 20, 2009.
Performance
ZCS.TO vs. DXV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZCS.TO vs. DXV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZCS.TO BMO Short Corporate Bond Index ETF | 0.15% | 4.41% | 7.42% | 6.67% | -4.48% | -0.76% | 6.10% | 5.01% | 1.28% |
DXV.TO Dynamic Active Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 0.54% | 4.04% | 5.84% | 6.04% | 1.49% | -0.21% | 3.59% | 3.58% | 0.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZCS.TO achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly lower than DXV.TO's 0.54% return.
ZCS.TO
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- YTD
- 0.15%
- 6M
- 0.61%
- 1Y
- 3.27%
- 3Y*
- 5.49%
- 5Y*
- 2.68%
- 10Y*
- 2.75%
DXV.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.54%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 3.67%
- 3Y*
- 5.05%
- 5Y*
- 3.42%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZCS.TO vs. DXV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
ZCS.TO vs. DXV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZCS.TO
DXV.TO
ZCS.TO vs. DXV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Short Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZCS.TO) and Dynamic Active Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (DXV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZCS.TO | DXV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.57 | 2.45 | -0.89 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.09 | 3.78 | -1.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.51 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 7.14 | -5.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.00 | 35.41 | -26.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZCS.TO | DXV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 2.45 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 1.13 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.67 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZCS.TO and DXV.TO is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ZCS.TO vs. DXV.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZCS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than DXV.TO's 3.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZCS.TO BMO Short Corporate Bond Index ETF | 3.82% | 3.60% | 3.27% | 3.35% | 3.23% | 2.99% | 2.88% | 2.96% | 2.88% | 3.04% | 3.34% | 3.53% |
DXV.TO Dynamic Active Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 3.17% | 3.35% | 5.32% | 6.33% | 3.98% | 0.69% | 1.89% | 2.25% | 1.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ZCS.TO vs. DXV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZCS.TO drawdown since its inception was -13.95%, which is greater than DXV.TO's maximum drawdown of -11.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCS.TO and DXV.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZCS.TO | DXV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.95% | -11.62% | -2.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.63% | -0.51% | -1.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.76% | -2.71% | -5.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | -0.11% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.90% | -0.39% | -0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.37% | 0.10% | +0.27% |
Volatility
ZCS.TO vs. DXV.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Short Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZCS.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to Dynamic Active Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (DXV.TO) at 0.62%. This indicates that ZCS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZCS.TO | DXV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.22% | 0.62% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.60% | 1.19% | +0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09% | 1.50% | +0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.86% | 3.05% | -0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.38% | 4.68% | -0.30% |