ZCN.TO vs. HXH.TO
ZCN.TO (BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF) and HXH.TO (Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF) are both Canada Equities funds - ZCN.TO tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index while HXH.TO tracks the Solactive Canadian High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZCN.TO returned 12.72%/yr vs 11.73%/yr for HXH.TO. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZCN.TO charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for HXH.TO.
Performance
ZCN.TO vs. HXH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZCN.TO achieves a 12.08% return, which is significantly lower than HXH.TO's 20.80% return. Over the past 10 years, ZCN.TO has outperformed HXH.TO with an annualized return of 12.72%, while HXH.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.73% annualized return.
ZCN.TO
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- 5.09%
- YTD
- 12.08%
- 6M
- 13.16%
- 1Y
- 36.95%
- 3Y*
- 24.35%
- 5Y*
- 15.19%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
HXH.TO
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 3.23%
- YTD
- 20.80%
- 6M
- 21.66%
- 1Y
- 42.18%
- 3Y*
- 22.00%
- 5Y*
- 16.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
ZCN.TO vs. HXH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZCN.TO BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF | 12.08% | 31.51% | 21.64% | 11.63% | -5.84% | 25.05% | 5.69% | 22.85% | -8.84% | 8.94% |
HXH.TO Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF | 20.80% | 25.86% | 15.24% | 6.33% | 5.00% | 34.51% | -7.66% | 22.17% | -14.86% | 8.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZCN.TO and HXH.TO is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2016 | 0.60 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ZCN.TO and HXH.TO has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
ZCN.TO vs. HXH.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZCN.TO
HXH.TO
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
ZCN.TO
HXH.TO
-
Basic Materials
ZCN.TO
HXH.TO
-
Energy
ZCN.TO
HXH.TO
-
Industrials
ZCN.TO
HXH.TO
-
Technology
ZCN.TO
HXH.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
ZCN.TO
HXH.TO
-
Utilities
ZCN.TO
HXH.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
ZCN.TO
HXH.TO
-
Communication Services
ZCN.TO
HXH.TO
-
Real Estate
ZCN.TO
HXH.TO
Healthcare
ZCN.TO
HXH.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZCN.TO vs. HXH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZCN.TO
HXH.TO
ZCN.TO vs. HXH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN.TO) and Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF (HXH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZCN.TO | HXH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 2.12 | -0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.99 | 16.79 | -12.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.58 | 52.44 | -33.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZCN.TO | HXH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92 | 5.17 | -2.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.17 | 1.33 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | 0.73 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.76 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
ZCN.TO vs. HXH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZCN.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.18%, smaller than the maximum HXH.TO drawdown of -40.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCN.TO and HXH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZCN.TO | HXH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.18% | -40.80% | +3.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.30% | -2.52% | -6.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.25% | -10.55% | -1.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.25% | -15.88% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.18% | -40.80% | +3.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.32% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.76% | -4.86% | +0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 0.81% | +1.18% |
Volatility
ZCN.TO vs. HXH.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.63% compared to Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF (HXH.TO) at 2.94%. This indicates that ZCN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HXH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZCN.TO | HXH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 2.94% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.37% | 6.79% | +3.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.71% | 8.23% | +4.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.10% | 12.18% | +0.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.99% | 16.05% | -1.06% |
ZCN.TO vs. HXH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZCN.TO has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than HXH.TO's 0.11% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZCN.TO vs. HXH.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZCN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, while HXH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXH.TO Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZCN.TO BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF | 2.00% | 2.22% | 2.78% | 3.29% | 3.27% | 2.74% | 3.24% | 3.13% | 3.16% | 2.71% | 2.84% | 3.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZCN.TO and HXH.TO have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZCN.TO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZCN.TO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for HXH.TO.
ZCN.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index, while HXH.TO tracks Solactive Canadian High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for ZCN.TO and 0.11% for HXH.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZCN.TO and HXH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer