PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZCM.TO vs. ZIC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZCM.TO vs. ZIC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Mid Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZCM.TO) and BMO Mid-Term US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZIC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZCM.TO achieves a 1.96% return, which is significantly higher than ZIC.TO's 1.06% return. Over the past 10 years, ZCM.TO has underperformed ZIC.TO with an annualized return of 3.01%, while ZIC.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 3.47% annualized return.


ZCM.TO

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.85%
YTD
1.96%
6M
1.40%
1Y
5.13%
3Y*
6.78%
5Y*
2.32%
10Y*
3.01%

ZIC.TO

1D
-0.11%
1M
2.32%
YTD
1.06%
6M
-0.75%
1Y
7.10%
3Y*
6.85%
5Y*
3.89%
10Y*
3.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZCM.TO vs. ZIC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZCM.TO
BMO Mid Corporate Bond Index ETF
1.96%4.84%8.07%7.96%-10.18%-2.09%10.34%8.59%0.58%2.28%
ZIC.TO
BMO Mid-Term US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF
1.06%4.24%11.86%6.33%-8.93%-1.36%6.51%9.03%6.40%-1.26%

Correlation

The correlation between ZCM.TO and ZIC.TO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2013

0.42

The correlation between ZCM.TO and ZIC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.53 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZCM.TO vs. ZIC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZCM.TO
ZCM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
ZCM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZCM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZCM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
ZCM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZCM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

ZIC.TO
ZIC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
ZIC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZIC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZIC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
ZIC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZIC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZCM.TO vs. ZIC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Mid Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZCM.TO) and BMO Mid-Term US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZIC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZCM.TOZIC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.24

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

1.67

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.77

3.61

+1.16

ZCM.TO vs. ZIC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZCM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is comparable to the ZIC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZCM.TO and ZIC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZCM.TOZIC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

1.30

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.49

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.39

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.59

-0.04

Drawdowns

ZCM.TO vs. ZIC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZCM.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.06%, which is greater than ZIC.TO's maximum drawdown of -19.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCM.TO and ZIC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZCM.TOZIC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.06%

-19.49%

-6.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.08%

-4.26%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.02%

-6.96%

+2.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.82%

-15.66%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.06%

-19.49%

-6.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-1.69%

+1.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.61%

-5.15%

+2.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.08%

1.97%

-0.89%

Volatility

ZCM.TO vs. ZIC.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO Mid Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZCM.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.81% compared to BMO Mid-Term US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZIC.TO) at 1.68%. This indicates that ZCM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZIC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZCM.TOZIC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.81%

1.68%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.65%

4.17%

-0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.51%

5.47%

-0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.09%

7.95%

-1.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.76%

8.91%

-0.15%

ZCM.TO vs. ZIC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZCM.TO has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than ZIC.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZCM.TO vs. ZIC.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZCM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, less than ZIC.TO's 4.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZCM.TO
BMO Mid Corporate Bond Index ETF
4.25%4.03%3.84%3.93%3.80%3.29%3.12%3.33%3.22%3.04%3.18%3.42%
ZIC.TO
BMO Mid-Term US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF
4.32%4.03%3.79%3.84%3.93%3.52%3.46%3.56%3.46%3.32%3.29%3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZCM.TO and ZIC.TO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZIC.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZIC.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for ZCM.TO.

ZCM.TO tracks FTSE Canada Mid Term Corporate Bond Index, while ZIC.TO tracks Bloomberg US Investment Grade 5 to 10 Year Corporate Bond Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for ZCM.TO and 0.25% for ZIC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZCM.TO and ZIC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer