PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZCH.TO vs. XIEE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZCH.TO vs. XIEE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO MSCI China ESG Leaders Index ETF (ZCH.TO) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (XIEE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ZCH.TO is traded in CAD, while XIEE.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XIEE.DE values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZCH.TO achieves a -9.03% return, which is significantly lower than XIEE.DE's 7.28% return. Over the past 10 years, ZCH.TO has underperformed XIEE.DE with an annualized return of 1.75%, while XIEE.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.16% annualized return.


ZCH.TO

1D
-2.32%
1M
-0.59%
YTD
-9.03%
6M
-12.83%
1Y
5.31%
3Y*
11.03%
5Y*
-6.68%
10Y*
1.75%

XIEE.DE

1D
-0.56%
1M
5.07%
YTD
7.28%
6M
8.76%
1Y
19.92%
3Y*
17.76%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*
10.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZCH.TO vs. XIEE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZCH.TO
BMO MSCI China ESG Leaders Index ETF
-9.03%33.25%25.33%-11.83%-23.85%-41.03%37.62%17.26%-16.63%37.66%
XIEE.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF
7.28%29.63%10.44%16.75%-8.73%14.97%3.76%19.90%-8.08%17.84%

Correlation

The correlation between ZCH.TO and XIEE.DE is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2015

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZCH.TO vs. XIEE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZCH.TO
ZCH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
ZCH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZCH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZCH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
ZCH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZCH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

XIEE.DE
XIEE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
XIEE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIEE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIEE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
XIEE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIEE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZCH.TO vs. XIEE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI China ESG Leaders Index ETF (ZCH.TO) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (XIEE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZCH.TOXIEE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.26

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.23

1.78

-1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.45

6.77

-6.32

ZCH.TO vs. XIEE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZCH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the XIEE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZCH.TO and XIEE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZCH.TOXIEE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

1.42

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

0.78

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

0.66

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.59

-0.47

Drawdowns

ZCH.TO vs. XIEE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZCH.TO drawdown since its inception was -73.84%, which is greater than XIEE.DE's maximum drawdown of -29.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCH.TO and XIEE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZCH.TOXIEE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.84%

-29.71%

-44.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.50%

-11.14%

-12.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.64%

-16.28%

-9.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.44%

-25.59%

-37.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.84%

-29.71%

-44.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.00%

-1.86%

-50.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.62%

-4.99%

-21.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.82%

2.94%

+8.88%

Volatility

ZCH.TO vs. XIEE.DE - Volatility Comparison

BMO MSCI China ESG Leaders Index ETF (ZCH.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.06% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (XIEE.DE) at 5.30%. This indicates that ZCH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XIEE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZCH.TOXIEE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.06%

5.30%

+2.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.81%

11.52%

+4.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.12%

14.02%

+8.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.81%

15.04%

+17.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.56%

15.40%

+13.16%

ZCH.TO vs. XIEE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZCH.TO has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than XIEE.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZCH.TO vs. XIEE.DE - Dividend Comparison

ZCH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than XIEE.DE's 2.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XIEE.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF
2.45%2.49%3.26%2.85%5.70%1.50%3.74%0.30%3.19%0.92%0.09%0.00%
ZCH.TO
BMO MSCI China ESG Leaders Index ETF
1.40%1.28%2.22%3.96%1.21%0.00%0.51%1.18%1.32%0.56%1.65%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZCH.TO and XIEE.DE have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XIEE.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XIEE.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for ZCH.TO.

ZCH.TO is categorized as China Equities, while XIEE.DE is Europe Equities. ZCH.TO tracks MSCI China ESG Leaders Index, while XIEE.DE tracks MSCI Europe. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for ZCH.TO and 0.12% for XIEE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZCH.TO and XIEE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer