ZCBG vs. IBTE
ZCBG (Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2035 ETF) and IBTE (iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - ZCBG tracks the FTSE Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury STRIPS 2035 Maturity Index while IBTE tracks the ICE 2024 Maturity US Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Both charge a 0.07% expense ratio.
Performance
ZCBG vs. IBTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ZCBG
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBTE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZCBG vs. IBTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ZCBG Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2035 ETF | -1.10% |
IBTE iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZCBG vs. IBTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2035 ETF (ZCBG) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF (IBTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZCBG | IBTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.39 | — | — |
Drawdowns
ZCBG vs. IBTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZCBG drawdown since its inception was -5.11%, which is greater than IBTE's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCBG and IBTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZCBG | IBTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.11% | 0.00% | -5.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.89% | 0.00% | -3.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.99% | 0.00% | -1.99% |
Volatility
ZCBG vs. IBTE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZCBG | IBTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.33% | 0.00% | +6.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.33% | 0.00% | +6.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.33% | 0.00% | +6.33% |
ZCBG vs. IBTE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ZCBG and IBTE have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZCBG vs. IBTE - Dividend Comparison
ZCBG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, while IBTE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
IBTE iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF | 0.00% |
ZCBG Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2035 ETF | 1.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZCBG and IBTE have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.
ZCBG has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.00% for IBTE.
ZCBG tracks FTSE Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury STRIPS 2035 Maturity Index, while IBTE tracks ICE 2024 Maturity US Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares.
Find the right allocation for ZCBG and IBTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer