ZCBC vs. SHV
ZCBC (Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2032 ETF) and SHV (iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - ZCBC tracks the FTSE Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury STRIPS 2032 Maturity Index while SHV tracks the ICE Short US Treasury Securities Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZCBC charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SHV.
Performance
ZCBC vs. SHV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ZCBC
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -1.15%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHV
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 3.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.65%
- 5Y*
- 3.32%
- 10Y*
- 2.23%
ZCBC vs. SHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ZCBC Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2032 ETF | -0.79% |
SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 1.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZCBC and SHV is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZCBC vs. SHV — Risk / Return Rank
ZCBC
SHV
ZCBC vs. SHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2032 ETF (ZCBC) and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZCBC | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 19.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 11.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 8.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.42 | 4.50 | -4.93 |
Drawdowns
ZCBC vs. SHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZCBC drawdown since its inception was -3.65%, which is greater than SHV's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCBC and SHV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZCBC | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.65% | -0.45% | -3.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.05% | 0.00% | -3.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.46% | -0.03% | -1.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
ZCBC vs. SHV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZCBC | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.05% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.12% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.59% | 0.20% | +4.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.59% | 0.29% | +4.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.59% | 0.28% | +4.31% |
ZCBC vs. SHV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZCBC has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SHV's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZCBC vs. SHV - Dividend Comparison
ZCBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than SHV's 3.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 3.83% | 4.09% | 5.02% | 4.73% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.74% | 2.19% | 1.66% | 0.72% | 0.34% | 0.03% |
ZCBC Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2032 ETF | 1.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZCBC and SHV have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZCBC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZCBC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SHV.
SHV has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 1.61% for ZCBC.
ZCBC tracks FTSE Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury STRIPS 2032 Maturity Index, while SHV tracks ICE Short US Treasury Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for ZCBC and 0.15% for SHV.
Find the right allocation for ZCBC and SHV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer