PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ZBK.TO vs. ZQQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ZBK.TO vs. ZQQ.TO

Last updated Jul 1, 2026
See Documentation

ZBK.TO (BMO Equal Weight US Banks Index ETF) and ZQQ.TO (BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)) are both exchange-traded funds - ZBK.TO is a Financials Equities fund managed by BMO, while ZQQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 10 years, ZBK.TO returned 14.14%/yr vs 19.81%/yr for ZQQ.TO. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ZBK.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Equal Weight US Banks Index ETF (ZBK.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZBK.TO achieves a 14.86% return, which is significantly lower than ZQQ.TO's 18.49% return. Over the past 10 years, ZBK.TO has underperformed ZQQ.TO with an annualized return of 14.14%, while ZQQ.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.81% annualized return.

ZBK.TO

1D
-0.64%
1M
10.85%
YTD
14.86%
6M
14.22%
1Y
33.93%
3Y*
34.14%
5Y*
11.23%
10Y*
14.14%

ZQQ.TO

1D
1.60%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
18.49%
6M
17.55%
1Y
26.82%
3Y*
22.92%
5Y*
13.78%
10Y*
19.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZBK.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZBK.TO
BMO Equal Weight US Banks Index ETF		14.86%16.76%46.09%-6.69%-16.67%39.32%-7.76%29.46%-11.60%10.40%
ZQQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)		18.49%14.59%24.00%52.52%-33.75%26.68%45.33%37.08%-2.29%31.51%

Correlation

The correlation between ZBK.TO and ZQQ.TO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2014

0.40

The correlation between ZBK.TO and ZQQ.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BMO Equal Weight US Banks Index ETF

BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)

Often compared with ZQQ.TO:
ZQQ.TO vs. ZNQ.TOZQQ.TO vs. XQQ.TOZQQ.TO vs. QQC.TOZQQ.TO vs. QQQZQQ.TO vs. VFV.TOZQQ.TO vs. TEC.TOZQQ.TO vs. ZSP.TO

Return for Risk

ZBK.TO vs. ZQQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ZBK.TO
ZBK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
ZBK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZBK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZBK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
ZBK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZBK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO
ZQQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
ZQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZBK.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Equal Weight US Banks Index ETF (ZBK.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ZBK.TOZQQ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.64
1.47

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.24
1.99

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.27

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

1.72

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.11

5.44

+0.67

ZBK.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZBK.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the ZQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZBK.TO and ZQQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZBK.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZBK.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.80%, which is greater than ZQQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -36.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZBK.TO and ZQQ.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ZBK.TOZQQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.80%

-36.39%

-12.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.57%

-15.65%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.70%

-22.79%

-3.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.80%

-36.39%

-12.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.80%

-36.39%

-12.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

-1.39%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.32%

-5.46%

-6.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.56%

4.94%

+0.62%

Volatility

ZBK.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Equal Weight US Banks Index ETF (ZBK.TO) is 5.17%, while BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO) has a volatility of 9.57%. This indicates that ZBK.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZQQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ZBK.TOZQQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

9.57%

-4.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.62%

14.82%

+0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.83%

18.32%

+2.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.51%

22.94%

+3.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.76%

22.54%

+6.22%

Dividends

ZBK.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZBK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than ZQQ.TO's 0.22% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZBK.TO
BMO Equal Weight US Banks Index ETF		1.66%1.84%2.09%2.92%2.35%1.92%2.62%2.17%1.78%1.12%1.22%1.26%
ZQQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)		0.22%0.27%0.37%0.32%0.45%0.14%0.41%0.51%0.64%0.57%1.60%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

ZBK.TO and ZQQ.TO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZBK.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while ZQQ.TO is Nasdaq-100.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZBK.TO and ZQQ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer