PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ZBK.TO vs. CIC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ZBK.TO vs. CIC.TO

Last updated Jul 1, 2026
See Documentation

ZBK.TO (BMO Equal Weight US Banks Index ETF) and CIC.TO (CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, ZBK.TO returned 14.14%/yr vs 13.93%/yr for CIC.TO. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

ZBK.TO vs. CIC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Equal Weight US Banks Index ETF (ZBK.TO) and CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF (CIC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZBK.TO achieves a 14.86% return, which is significantly lower than CIC.TO's 26.10% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ZBK.TO having a 14.14% annualized return and CIC.TO not far behind at 13.93%.

ZBK.TO

1D
-0.64%
1M
10.85%
YTD
14.86%
6M
14.22%
1Y
33.93%
3Y*
34.14%
5Y*
11.23%
10Y*
14.14%

CIC.TO

1D
0.64%
1M
9.33%
YTD
26.10%
6M
25.61%
1Y
57.81%
3Y*
29.54%
5Y*
16.38%
10Y*
13.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZBK.TO vs. CIC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZBK.TO
BMO Equal Weight US Banks Index ETF		14.86%16.76%46.09%-6.69%-16.67%39.32%-7.76%29.46%-11.60%10.40%
CIC.TO
CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF		26.10%35.32%21.30%6.58%-10.99%33.76%1.89%14.12%-8.88%12.14%

Correlation

The correlation between ZBK.TO and CIC.TO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2014

0.57

The correlation between ZBK.TO and CIC.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BMO Equal Weight US Banks Index ETF

CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF

Often compared with CIC.TO:
CIC.TO vs. HEB.TOCIC.TO vs. FMAX.TOCIC.TO vs. CCOM.TOCIC.TO vs. ZEB.TOCIC.TO vs. CMNY.TOCIC.TO vs. ZWB.TOCIC.TO vs. VXM-B.TO

Return for Risk

ZBK.TO vs. CIC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ZBK.TO
ZBK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
ZBK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZBK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZBK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
ZBK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZBK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
CIC.TO
CIC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CIC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CIC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZBK.TO vs. CIC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Equal Weight US Banks Index ETF (ZBK.TO) and CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF (CIC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ZBK.TOCIC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.64
5.09

-3.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.24
6.94

-4.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.97

-0.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

7.06

-5.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.11

33.08

-26.97

ZBK.TO vs. CIC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZBK.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is lower than the CIC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 5.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZBK.TO and CIC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZBK.TO vs. CIC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZBK.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.80%, which is greater than CIC.TO's maximum drawdown of -38.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZBK.TO and CIC.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ZBK.TOCIC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.80%

-38.55%

-10.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.57%

-8.23%

-8.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.70%

-14.32%

-12.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.80%

-26.34%

-22.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.80%

-38.55%

-10.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

0.00%

-0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.32%

-5.47%

-6.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.56%

1.75%

+3.81%

Volatility

ZBK.TO vs. CIC.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO Equal Weight US Banks Index ETF (ZBK.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF (CIC.TO) at 2.60%. This indicates that ZBK.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ZBK.TOCIC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

2.60%

+2.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.62%

9.90%

+5.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.83%

11.44%

+9.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.51%

12.80%

+13.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.76%

16.26%

+12.50%

Dividends

ZBK.TO vs. CIC.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZBK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than CIC.TO's 4.94% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIC.TO
CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF		4.94%5.17%6.71%7.37%7.64%5.48%9.56%6.16%6.61%5.68%6.72%7.31%
ZBK.TO
BMO Equal Weight US Banks Index ETF		1.66%1.84%2.09%2.92%2.35%1.92%2.62%2.17%1.78%1.12%1.22%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

ZBK.TO and CIC.TO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: BMO and CI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZBK.TO and CIC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer