PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZBK.TO vs. CBNK.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZBK.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Equal Weight US Banks Index ETF (ZBK.TO) and Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF (CBNK.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZBK.TO achieves a 14.86% return, which is significantly lower than CBNK.TO's 42.99% return.


ZBK.TO

1D
-0.64%
1M
10.85%
YTD
14.86%
6M
14.22%
1Y
33.93%
3Y*
34.14%
5Y*
11.23%
10Y*
14.14%

CBNK.TO

1D
0.55%
1M
15.66%
YTD
42.99%
6M
42.25%
1Y
96.19%
3Y*
43.24%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZBK.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ZBK.TO
BMO Equal Weight US Banks Index ETF
14.86%16.76%46.09%-6.69%-13.52%
CBNK.TO
Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF
42.99%51.67%27.42%8.42%-19.87%

Correlation

The correlation between ZBK.TO and CBNK.TO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2022

0.58

The correlation between ZBK.TO and CBNK.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZBK.TO vs. CBNK.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZBK.TO
ZBK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
ZBK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZBK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZBK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
ZBK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZBK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

CBNK.TO
CBNK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBNK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBNK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CBNK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBNK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZBK.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Equal Weight US Banks Index ETF (ZBK.TO) and Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF (CBNK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZBK.TOCBNK.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

2.02

-0.73

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

9.64

-7.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.11

41.70

-35.59

ZBK.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZBK.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is lower than the CBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio of 6.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZBK.TO and CBNK.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZBK.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZBK.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.80%, which is greater than CBNK.TO's maximum drawdown of -32.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZBK.TO and CBNK.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZBK.TOCBNK.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.80%

-32.12%

-16.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.57%

-10.03%

-6.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.70%

-17.92%

-8.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

0.00%

-0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.32%

-10.73%

-1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.56%

2.31%

+3.25%

Volatility

ZBK.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO Equal Weight US Banks Index ETF (ZBK.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF (CBNK.TO) at 3.31%. This indicates that ZBK.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBNK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZBK.TOCBNK.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

3.31%

+1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.62%

13.46%

+2.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.83%

15.73%

+5.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.51%

17.50%

+9.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.76%

17.50%

+11.26%

Dividends

ZBK.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZBK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than CBNK.TO's 4.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBNK.TO
Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF
4.87%5.86%8.25%9.59%7.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZBK.TO
BMO Equal Weight US Banks Index ETF
1.66%1.84%2.09%2.92%2.35%1.92%2.62%2.17%1.78%1.12%1.22%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZBK.TO and CBNK.TO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZBK.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while CBNK.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Mulvihill.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZBK.TO and CBNK.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer