PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZAUG vs. UAUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZAUG vs. UAUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr August (ZAUG) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - August (UAUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZAUG achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly lower than UAUG's 4.84% return.


ZAUG

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.72%
YTD
2.70%
6M
3.10%
1Y
8.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UAUG

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.60%
YTD
4.84%
6M
5.32%
1Y
15.19%
3Y*
14.57%
5Y*
7.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZAUG vs. UAUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZAUG and UAUG is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2024

0.86

The correlation between ZAUG and UAUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZAUG vs. UAUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZAUG
ZAUG Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ZAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ZAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

UAUG
UAUG Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
UAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
UAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
UAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
UAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZAUG vs. UAUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr August (ZAUG) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - August (UAUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZAUGUAUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.73

1.57

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.71

3.85

+0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.32

20.38

+6.94

ZAUG vs. UAUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZAUG Sharpe Ratio is 3.31, which is comparable to the UAUG Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZAUG and UAUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZAUGUAUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.31

2.78

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.66

0.91

+0.74

Drawdowns

ZAUG vs. UAUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZAUG drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, smaller than the maximum UAUG drawdown of -13.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZAUG and UAUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZAUGUAUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.83%

-13.91%

+9.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.72%

-3.96%

+2.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-0.10%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.41%

-2.36%

+1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

0.75%

-0.45%

Volatility

ZAUG vs. UAUG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr August (ZAUG) is 0.29%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - August (UAUG) has a volatility of 0.60%. This indicates that ZAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UAUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZAUGUAUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.29%

0.60%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.81%

4.13%

-2.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47%

5.51%

-3.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.58%

7.89%

-3.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.58%

8.72%

-4.14%

ZAUG vs. UAUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZAUG and UAUG have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

ZAUG vs. UAUG - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZAUG nor UAUG has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
UAUG
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - August
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.83%
ZAUG
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr August
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZAUG and UAUG have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UAUG has higher volatility (0.60%) compared to ZAUG (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZAUG dropped -4.83% vs UAUG's -13.91%.

On 1-year performance, UAUG leads with 15.19% vs 8.08% for ZAUG. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, ZAUG has been the lower-risk option at 0.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, UAUG has performed better with a 15.19% return vs 8.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ZAUG and UAUG have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

ZAUG and UAUG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

ZAUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 2.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZAUG and UAUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer