ZAUG vs. NAPR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr August (ZAUG) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR).

ZAUG and NAPR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZAUG is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Jul 31, 2024. NAPR is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 31, 2020.

Performance

ZAUG vs. NAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr August (ZAUG) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ZAUG vs. NAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ZAUG Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr August	-0.33%	7.38%	3.62%
NAPR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April	1.71%	6.56%	7.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZAUG achieves a -0.33% return, which is significantly lower than NAPR's 1.71% return.

ZAUG

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: -0.97%
• YTD: -0.33%
• 6M: 0.63%
• 1Y: 7.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NAPR

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 0.66%
• YTD: 1.71%
• 6M: 3.74%
• 1Y: 14.51%
• 3Y*: 11.94%
• 5Y*: 8.69%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZAUG vs. NAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZAUG and NAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

ZAUG

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr August

NAPR

Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April

Return for Risk

ZAUG vs. NAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZAUG

ZAUG Risk / Return Rank: 89
ZAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
ZAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
ZAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 94
ZAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
ZAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 93

NAPR

NAPR Risk / Return Rank: 86
NAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
NAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
NAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 96
NAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
NAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZAUG vs. NAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr August (ZAUG) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZAUG	NAPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	1.51	+0.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	2.43	+0.06
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.52	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	1.93	+0.63
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.53	14.15	-0.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZAUG vs. NAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZAUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the NAPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZAUG and NAPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZAUG	NAPR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.71	1.51	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.77	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.36	0.95	+0.41

Correlation

The correlation between ZAUG and NAPR is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ZAUG vs. NAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZAUG nor NAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ZAUG vs. NAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZAUG drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, smaller than the maximum NAPR drawdown of -16.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZAUG and NAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZAUG	NAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.83%	-16.53%	+11.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.13%	-7.53%	+4.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.10%	0.00%	-1.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.44%	-2.34%	+1.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.59%	1.03%	-0.44%

Volatility

ZAUG vs. NAPR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr August (ZAUG) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) at 0.65%. This indicates that ZAUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZAUG	NAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.22%	0.65%	+0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.83%	2.23%	-0.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.61%	9.65%	-5.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.77%	11.30%	-6.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.77%	10.71%	-5.94%