ZAP vs. SHLD

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD).

ZAP and SHLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZAP is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Global X U.S. Electrification Index. It was launched on Dec 17, 2024. SHLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Global X Defense Tech Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Sep 11, 2023. Both ZAP and SHLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ZAP vs. SHLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ZAP vs. SHLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ZAP Global X U.S. Electrification ETF	10.67%	21.84%	1.26%
SHLD Global X Defense Tech ETF	9.34%	74.16%	1.61%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZAP achieves a 10.67% return, which is significantly higher than SHLD's 9.34% return.

ZAP

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: -3.57%
• YTD: 10.67%
• 6M: 9.86%
• 1Y: 33.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SHLD

• 1D: 3.72%
• 1M: -5.37%
• YTD: 9.34%
• 6M: 1.22%
• 1Y: 53.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZAP vs. SHLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZAP and SHLD have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

ZAP

Global X U.S. Electrification ETF

SHLD

Global X Defense Tech ETF

Return for Risk

ZAP vs. SHLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZAP

ZAP Risk / Return Rank: 91
ZAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
ZAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
ZAP Omega Ratio Rank: 89
ZAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
ZAP Martin Ratio Rank: 90

SHLD

SHLD Risk / Return Rank: 92
SHLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
SHLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
SHLD Omega Ratio Rank: 90
SHLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
SHLD Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZAP vs. SHLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZAP	SHLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	2.10	-0.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	2.75	-0.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.36	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.99	3.53	+0.46
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.91	10.28	+1.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZAP vs. SHLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZAP Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the SHLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZAP and SHLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZAP	SHLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.07	2.10	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.69	2.53	-0.84

Correlation

The correlation between ZAP and SHLD is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ZAP vs. SHLD - Dividend Comparison

ZAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than SHLD's 0.50% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ZAP Global X U.S. Electrification ETF	1.64%	1.81%	0.00%	0.00%
SHLD Global X Defense Tech ETF	0.50%	0.55%	0.53%	0.26%

Drawdowns

ZAP vs. SHLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZAP drawdown since its inception was -12.38%, smaller than the maximum SHLD drawdown of -15.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZAP and SHLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZAP	SHLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.38%	-15.06%	+2.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.59%	-15.06%	+6.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.71%	-9.20%	+5.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.67%	-2.57%	-0.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.88%	5.17%	-2.29%

Volatility

ZAP vs. SHLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP) is 5.40%, while Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) has a volatility of 8.85%. This indicates that ZAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZAP	SHLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.40%	8.85%	-3.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.77%	18.37%	-7.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.07%	25.40%	-9.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.55%	20.70%	-4.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.55%	20.70%	-4.15%