PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZAP vs. DTCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZAP vs. DTCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZAP achieves a 15.14% return, which is significantly lower than DTCR's 52.56% return.


ZAP

1D
-0.63%
1M
-3.98%
YTD
15.14%
6M
13.19%
1Y
28.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DTCR

1D
-0.74%
1M
11.31%
YTD
52.56%
6M
54.49%
1Y
84.73%
3Y*
36.32%
5Y*
15.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZAP vs. DTCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ZAP
Global X U.S. Electrification ETF
15.14%21.84%1.26%
DTCR
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF
52.56%28.99%2.12%

Correlation

The correlation between ZAP and DTCR is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024

0.56

The correlation between ZAP and DTCR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZAP vs. DTCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZAP
ZAP Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ZAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZAP Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
ZAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZAP Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

DTCR
DTCR Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DTCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTCR Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DTCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTCR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZAP vs. DTCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZAPDTCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.61

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.01

6.61

-2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.25

20.78

-10.52

ZAP vs. DTCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZAP Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is lower than the DTCR Sharpe Ratio of 3.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZAP and DTCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZAPDTCRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

3.90

-1.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.63

0.76

+0.87

Drawdowns

ZAP vs. DTCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZAP drawdown since its inception was -12.38%, smaller than the maximum DTCR drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZAP and DTCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZAPDTCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.38%

-38.98%

+26.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.23%

-12.89%

+5.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.11%

-0.74%

-3.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.57%

-12.37%

+9.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

4.09%

-1.26%

Volatility

ZAP vs. DTCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP) is 6.28%, while Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that ZAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DTCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZAPDTCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.28%

7.16%

-0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.74%

16.92%

-5.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.13%

21.84%

-6.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

21.83%

-4.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.91%

21.90%

-4.99%

ZAP vs. DTCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZAP and DTCR have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

ZAP vs. DTCR - Dividend Comparison

ZAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than DTCR's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DTCR
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF
0.72%1.10%1.72%1.18%2.57%1.27%0.30%
ZAP
Global X U.S. Electrification ETF
1.55%1.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZAP and DTCR have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DTCR has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to ZAP (6.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZAP dropped -12.38% vs DTCR's -38.98%.

On 1-year performance, DTCR leads with 84.73% vs 28.84% for ZAP. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, ZAP has been the lower-risk option at 6.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DTCR has performed better with a 84.73% return vs 28.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ZAP and DTCR have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

ZAP has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 0.72% for DTCR.

ZAP is categorized as Utilities Equities, while DTCR is REIT. ZAP tracks Global X U.S. Electrification Index, while DTCR tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index.

DTCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.90 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZAP and DTCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer