PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZAG.TO vs. ZDB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZAG.TO vs. ZDB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO) and BMO Discount Bond (ZDB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZAG.TO achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly higher than ZDB.TO's 1.53% return. Over the past 10 years, ZAG.TO has outperformed ZDB.TO with an annualized return of 1.66%, while ZDB.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.57% annualized return.


ZAG.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
1.75%
YTD
1.70%
6M
0.89%
1Y
3.25%
3Y*
4.24%
5Y*
0.76%
10Y*
1.66%

ZDB.TO

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.48%
YTD
1.53%
6M
0.70%
1Y
2.71%
3Y*
4.07%
5Y*
0.56%
10Y*
1.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZAG.TO vs. ZDB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZAG.TO
BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF
1.70%2.25%4.48%6.41%-11.60%-2.60%8.34%6.84%1.12%2.45%
ZDB.TO
BMO Discount Bond
1.53%2.03%4.26%6.69%-11.99%-2.77%9.50%6.74%1.33%2.00%

Correlation

The correlation between ZAG.TO and ZDB.TO is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2014

0.78

The correlation between ZAG.TO and ZDB.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.94 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZAG.TO vs. ZDB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZAG.TO
ZAG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
ZAG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

ZDB.TO
ZDB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
ZDB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZDB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZDB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
ZDB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZDB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZAG.TO vs. ZDB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO) and BMO Discount Bond (ZDB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZAG.TOZDB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.11

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

0.97

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.73

2.23

+0.50

ZAG.TO vs. ZDB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZAG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is comparable to the ZDB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZAG.TO and ZDB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZAG.TOZDB.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

0.63

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.09

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.25

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.38

+0.07

Drawdowns

ZAG.TO vs. ZDB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZAG.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.03%, roughly equal to the maximum ZDB.TO drawdown of -18.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZAG.TO and ZDB.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZAG.TOZDB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.03%

-18.09%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.79%

-2.79%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.42%

-5.07%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.77%

-16.25%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.03%

-18.09%

+0.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

-1.45%

+0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.54%

-4.21%

+0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

1.22%

-0.03%

Volatility

ZAG.TO vs. ZDB.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.68% compared to BMO Discount Bond (ZDB.TO) at 1.55%. This indicates that ZAG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZDB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZAG.TOZDB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.68%

1.55%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.43%

3.32%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.46%

4.34%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.58%

6.52%

+0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.11%

6.40%

+0.71%

ZAG.TO vs. ZDB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZAG.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ZDB.TO's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZAG.TO vs. ZDB.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZAG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than ZDB.TO's 2.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZAG.TO
BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF
3.42%3.48%3.44%3.47%3.56%3.04%2.88%3.03%2.92%2.95%3.07%3.13%
ZDB.TO
BMO Discount Bond
2.00%2.28%2.38%2.42%2.52%2.16%2.06%2.20%2.07%2.06%1.95%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZAG.TO and ZDB.TO have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZAG.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZAG.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for ZDB.TO.

ZAG.TO tracks FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index, while ZDB.TO tracks FTSE Canada Universe Discount Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ZAG.TO and 0.10% for ZDB.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZAG.TO and ZDB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer