ZAG.TO vs. ZDB.TO
ZAG.TO (BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF) and ZDB.TO (BMO Discount Bond) are both Canadian Government Bonds funds from BMO - ZAG.TO tracks the FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index while ZDB.TO tracks the FTSE Canada Universe Discount Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZAG.TO returned 1.66%/yr vs 1.57%/yr for ZDB.TO. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZAG.TO charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for ZDB.TO.
Performance
ZAG.TO vs. ZDB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZAG.TO achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly higher than ZDB.TO's 1.53% return. Over the past 10 years, ZAG.TO has outperformed ZDB.TO with an annualized return of 1.66%, while ZDB.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.57% annualized return.
ZAG.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 1.70%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- 3.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.24%
- 5Y*
- 0.76%
- 10Y*
- 1.66%
ZDB.TO
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- YTD
- 1.53%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 2.71%
- 3Y*
- 4.07%
- 5Y*
- 0.56%
- 10Y*
- 1.57%
ZAG.TO vs. ZDB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZAG.TO BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 1.70% | 2.25% | 4.48% | 6.41% | -11.60% | -2.60% | 8.34% | 6.84% | 1.12% | 2.45% |
ZDB.TO BMO Discount Bond | 1.53% | 2.03% | 4.26% | 6.69% | -11.99% | -2.77% | 9.50% | 6.74% | 1.33% | 2.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZAG.TO and ZDB.TO is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2014 | 0.78 |
The correlation between ZAG.TO and ZDB.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.94 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZAG.TO vs. ZDB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZAG.TO
ZDB.TO
ZAG.TO vs. ZDB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO) and BMO Discount Bond (ZDB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZAG.TO | ZDB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.11 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 0.97 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.73 | 2.23 | +0.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZAG.TO | ZDB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 0.63 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.09 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | 0.25 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.38 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
ZAG.TO vs. ZDB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZAG.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.03%, roughly equal to the maximum ZDB.TO drawdown of -18.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZAG.TO and ZDB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZAG.TO | ZDB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.03% | -18.09% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.79% | -2.79% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.42% | -5.07% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.77% | -16.25% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.03% | -18.09% | +0.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.09% | -1.45% | +0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.54% | -4.21% | +0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.19% | 1.22% | -0.03% |
Volatility
ZAG.TO vs. ZDB.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.68% compared to BMO Discount Bond (ZDB.TO) at 1.55%. This indicates that ZAG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZDB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZAG.TO | ZDB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.68% | 1.55% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.43% | 3.32% | +0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.46% | 4.34% | +0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.58% | 6.52% | +0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.11% | 6.40% | +0.71% |
ZAG.TO vs. ZDB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZAG.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ZDB.TO's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZAG.TO vs. ZDB.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZAG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than ZDB.TO's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZAG.TO BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 3.42% | 3.48% | 3.44% | 3.47% | 3.56% | 3.04% | 2.88% | 3.03% | 2.92% | 2.95% | 3.07% | 3.13% |
ZDB.TO BMO Discount Bond | 2.00% | 2.28% | 2.38% | 2.42% | 2.52% | 2.16% | 2.06% | 2.20% | 2.07% | 2.06% | 1.95% | 1.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZAG.TO and ZDB.TO have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZAG.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZAG.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for ZDB.TO.
ZAG.TO tracks FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index, while ZDB.TO tracks FTSE Canada Universe Discount Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ZAG.TO and 0.10% for ZDB.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZAG.TO and ZDB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer