ZAG.TO vs. ZCS.TO
ZAG.TO (BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF) and ZCS.TO (BMO Short Corporate Bond Index ETF) are both Canadian Government Bonds funds from BMO - ZAG.TO tracks the FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index while ZCS.TO tracks the FTSE Canada Short Term Corporate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZAG.TO returned 1.66%/yr vs 2.79%/yr for ZCS.TO. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZAG.TO charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for ZCS.TO.
Performance
ZAG.TO vs. ZCS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZAG.TO achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly higher than ZCS.TO's 1.29% return. Over the past 10 years, ZAG.TO has underperformed ZCS.TO with an annualized return of 1.66%, while ZCS.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 2.79% annualized return.
ZAG.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 1.70%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- 3.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.24%
- 5Y*
- 0.76%
- 10Y*
- 1.66%
ZCS.TO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- 5.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.85%
- 10Y*
- 2.79%
ZAG.TO vs. ZCS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZAG.TO BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 1.70% | 2.25% | 4.48% | 6.41% | -11.60% | -2.60% | 8.34% | 6.84% | 1.12% | 2.45% |
ZCS.TO BMO Short Corporate Bond Index ETF | 1.29% | 4.41% | 7.42% | 6.67% | -4.48% | -0.76% | 6.10% | 5.01% | 1.23% | 1.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZAG.TO and ZCS.TO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2010 | 0.58 |
The correlation between ZAG.TO and ZCS.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ZAG.TO vs. ZCS.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZAG.TO
ZCS.TO
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
ZAG.TO
ZCS.TO
Basic Materials
ZAG.TO
-
ZCS.TO
-
Communication Services
ZAG.TO
-
ZCS.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
ZAG.TO
-
ZCS.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
ZAG.TO
-
ZCS.TO
-
Energy
ZAG.TO
-
ZCS.TO
-
Financial Services
ZAG.TO
-
ZCS.TO
-
Healthcare
ZAG.TO
-
ZCS.TO
-
Industrials
ZAG.TO
-
ZCS.TO
-
Technology
ZAG.TO
-
ZCS.TO
-
Utilities
ZAG.TO
-
ZCS.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZAG.TO vs. ZCS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZAG.TO
ZCS.TO
ZAG.TO vs. ZCS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO) and BMO Short Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZCS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZAG.TO | ZCS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.41 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 2.44 | -1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.73 | 9.64 | -6.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZAG.TO | ZCS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 1.95 | -1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 1.00 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | 0.64 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.80 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
ZAG.TO vs. ZCS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZAG.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.03%, which is greater than ZCS.TO's maximum drawdown of -13.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZAG.TO and ZCS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZAG.TO | ZCS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.03% | -13.95% | -4.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.79% | -1.63% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.42% | -1.63% | -3.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.77% | -7.76% | -8.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.03% | -13.95% | -4.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.09% | -0.04% | -1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.54% | -0.89% | -2.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.19% | 0.41% | +0.78% |
Volatility
ZAG.TO vs. ZCS.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.68% compared to BMO Short Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZCS.TO) at 0.69%. This indicates that ZAG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZCS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZAG.TO | ZCS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.68% | 0.69% | +0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.43% | 1.79% | +1.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.46% | 2.05% | +2.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.58% | 2.87% | +3.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.11% | 4.38% | +2.73% |
ZAG.TO vs. ZCS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZAG.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ZCS.TO's 0.11% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZAG.TO vs. ZCS.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZAG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than ZCS.TO's 3.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZAG.TO BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 3.42% | 3.48% | 3.44% | 3.47% | 3.56% | 3.04% | 2.88% | 3.03% | 2.92% | 2.95% | 3.07% | 3.13% |
ZCS.TO BMO Short Corporate Bond Index ETF | 3.93% | 3.60% | 3.27% | 3.35% | 3.23% | 2.99% | 2.88% | 2.96% | 2.88% | 3.04% | 3.34% | 3.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZAG.TO and ZCS.TO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZAG.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZAG.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for ZCS.TO.
ZAG.TO tracks FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index, while ZCS.TO tracks FTSE Canada Short Term Corporate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ZAG.TO and 0.11% for ZCS.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZAG.TO and ZCS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer