PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZAG.TO vs. ZBI.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZAG.TO vs. ZBI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO) and BMO Canadian Bank Income Index ETF (ZBI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ZAG.TO having a 1.70% return and ZBI.TO slightly lower at 1.64%.


ZAG.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
1.75%
YTD
1.70%
6M
0.89%
1Y
3.25%
3Y*
4.24%
5Y*
0.76%
10Y*
1.66%

ZBI.TO

1D
0.10%
1M
0.78%
YTD
1.64%
6M
1.59%
1Y
5.19%
3Y*
8.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZAG.TO vs. ZBI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ZAG.TO
BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF
1.70%2.25%4.48%6.41%-7.06%
ZBI.TO
BMO Canadian Bank Income Index ETF
1.64%5.10%12.50%6.85%-3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between ZAG.TO and ZBI.TO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2022

0.32

The correlation between ZAG.TO and ZBI.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZAG.TO vs. ZBI.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZAG.TO
ZAG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
ZAG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

ZBI.TO
ZBI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ZBI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZBI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZBI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ZBI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZBI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZAG.TO vs. ZBI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO) and BMO Canadian Bank Income Index ETF (ZBI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZAG.TOZBI.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.57

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

4.32

-3.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.73

21.01

-18.28

ZAG.TO vs. ZBI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZAG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the ZBI.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZAG.TO and ZBI.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZAG.TOZBI.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

2.59

-1.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

1.25

-0.80

Drawdowns

ZAG.TO vs. ZBI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZAG.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.03%, which is greater than ZBI.TO's maximum drawdown of -8.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZAG.TO and ZBI.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZAG.TOZBI.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.03%

-8.22%

-9.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.79%

-1.21%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.42%

-1.47%

-3.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

-0.00%

-1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.54%

-2.25%

-1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

0.25%

+0.94%

Volatility

ZAG.TO vs. ZBI.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.68% compared to BMO Canadian Bank Income Index ETF (ZBI.TO) at 0.56%. This indicates that ZAG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZBI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZAG.TOZBI.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.68%

0.56%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.43%

1.57%

+1.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.46%

2.02%

+2.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.58%

4.01%

+2.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.11%

4.01%

+3.10%

ZAG.TO vs. ZBI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZAG.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ZBI.TO's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZAG.TO vs. ZBI.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZAG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than ZBI.TO's 4.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZAG.TO
BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF
3.42%3.48%3.44%3.47%3.56%3.04%2.88%3.03%2.92%2.95%3.07%3.13%
ZBI.TO
BMO Canadian Bank Income Index ETF
4.24%4.01%3.36%3.58%2.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZAG.TO and ZBI.TO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZAG.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZAG.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for ZBI.TO.

ZAG.TO tracks FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index, while ZBI.TO tracks Solactive Canadian Bank Income Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ZAG.TO and 0.28% for ZBI.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZAG.TO and ZBI.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer