PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZAG.TO vs. VFV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZAG.TO vs. VFV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZAG.TO achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly lower than VFV.TO's 10.06% return.


ZAG.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
1.82%
YTD
1.70%
6M
1.18%
1Y
2.95%
3Y*
4.31%
5Y*
0.76%
10Y*
1.68%

VFV.TO

1D
-2.35%
1M
2.71%
YTD
10.06%
6M
8.92%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZAG.TO vs. VFV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ZAG.TO
BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF
1.70%1.97%
VFV.TO
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF
10.06%14.91%

Correlation

The correlation between ZAG.TO and VFV.TO is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZAG.TO vs. VFV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZAG.TO
ZAG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
ZAG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

VFV.TO
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZAG.TO vs. VFV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZAG.TOVFV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.48

ZAG.TO vs. VFV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZAG.TOVFV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

2.30

-1.84

Drawdowns

ZAG.TO vs. VFV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZAG.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.03%, which is greater than VFV.TO's maximum drawdown of -8.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZAG.TO and VFV.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZAG.TOVFV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.03%

-8.62%

-9.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

-2.35%

+1.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.54%

-1.38%

-2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

Volatility

ZAG.TO vs. VFV.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZAG.TOVFV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.45%

11.65%

-7.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.58%

11.65%

-5.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.11%

11.65%

-4.54%

ZAG.TO vs. VFV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZAG.TO and VFV.TO have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZAG.TO vs. VFV.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZAG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than VFV.TO's 0.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFV.TO
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF
0.85%0.92%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZAG.TO
BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF
3.42%3.48%3.44%3.47%3.56%3.04%2.88%3.03%2.92%2.95%3.07%3.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZAG.TO and VFV.TO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZAG.TO and VFV.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

ZAG.TO is categorized as Canadian Government Bonds, while VFV.TO is S&P 500. ZAG.TO tracks FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index, while VFV.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Vanguard.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZAG.TO and VFV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer