ZAG.TO vs. VFV.TO
ZAG.TO (BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF) and VFV.TO (Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZAG.TO is a Canadian Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index, while VFV.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.
Performance
ZAG.TO vs. VFV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZAG.TO achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly lower than VFV.TO's 10.06% return.
ZAG.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 1.70%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 2.95%
- 3Y*
- 4.31%
- 5Y*
- 0.76%
- 10Y*
- 1.68%
VFV.TO
- 1D
- -2.35%
- 1M
- 2.71%
- YTD
- 10.06%
- 6M
- 8.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZAG.TO vs. VFV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ZAG.TO BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 1.70% | 1.97% |
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF | 10.06% | 14.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZAG.TO and VFV.TO is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZAG.TO vs. VFV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZAG.TO
VFV.TO
ZAG.TO vs. VFV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZAG.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.48 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZAG.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 2.30 | -1.84 |
Drawdowns
ZAG.TO vs. VFV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZAG.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.03%, which is greater than VFV.TO's maximum drawdown of -8.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZAG.TO and VFV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZAG.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.03% | -8.62% | -9.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.09% | -2.35% | +1.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.54% | -1.38% | -2.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.19% | — | — |
Volatility
ZAG.TO vs. VFV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZAG.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.68% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.43% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.45% | 11.65% | -7.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.58% | 11.65% | -5.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.11% | 11.65% | -4.54% |
ZAG.TO vs. VFV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ZAG.TO and VFV.TO have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZAG.TO vs. VFV.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZAG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than VFV.TO's 0.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF | 0.85% | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZAG.TO BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 3.42% | 3.48% | 3.44% | 3.47% | 3.56% | 3.04% | 2.88% | 3.03% | 2.92% | 2.95% | 3.07% | 3.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZAG.TO and VFV.TO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZAG.TO and VFV.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.
ZAG.TO is categorized as Canadian Government Bonds, while VFV.TO is S&P 500. ZAG.TO tracks FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index, while VFV.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Vanguard.
Find the right allocation for ZAG.TO and VFV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer