ZAG.TO vs. CORE.TO
ZAG.TO (BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF) and CORE.TO (PIMCO Canadian Core Bond Fund) are both Canadian Government Bonds funds. ZAG.TO is passively managed, while CORE.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, ZAG.TO returned 3.25% vs 4.48% for CORE.TO. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ZAG.TO charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for CORE.TO.
Performance
ZAG.TO vs. CORE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZAG.TO achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly lower than CORE.TO's 2.24% return.
ZAG.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 1.70%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- 3.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.24%
- 5Y*
- 0.76%
- 10Y*
- 1.66%
CORE.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.93%
- YTD
- 2.24%
- 6M
- 1.42%
- 1Y
- 4.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZAG.TO vs. CORE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ZAG.TO BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 1.70% | 2.25% | 1.60% |
CORE.TO PIMCO Canadian Core Bond Fund | 2.24% | 4.02% | 0.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZAG.TO and CORE.TO is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2024 | 0.86 |
The correlation between ZAG.TO and CORE.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZAG.TO vs. CORE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZAG.TO
CORE.TO
ZAG.TO vs. CORE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO) and PIMCO Canadian Core Bond Fund (CORE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZAG.TO | CORE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.19 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 1.50 | -0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.73 | 3.71 | -0.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZAG.TO | CORE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 1.09 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.79 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
ZAG.TO vs. CORE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZAG.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.03%, which is greater than CORE.TO's maximum drawdown of -3.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZAG.TO and CORE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZAG.TO | CORE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.03% | -3.48% | -14.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.79% | -2.99% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.09% | -0.27% | -0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.54% | -1.36% | -2.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.19% | 1.21% | -0.02% |
Volatility
ZAG.TO vs. CORE.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.68% compared to PIMCO Canadian Core Bond Fund (CORE.TO) at 1.46%. This indicates that ZAG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CORE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZAG.TO | CORE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.68% | 1.46% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.43% | 3.17% | +0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.46% | 4.13% | +0.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.58% | 5.01% | +1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.11% | 5.01% | +2.10% |
ZAG.TO vs. CORE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZAG.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than CORE.TO's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZAG.TO vs. CORE.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZAG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than CORE.TO's 3.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CORE.TO PIMCO Canadian Core Bond Fund | 3.36% | 3.42% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZAG.TO BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 3.42% | 3.48% | 3.44% | 3.47% | 3.56% | 3.04% | 2.88% | 3.03% | 2.92% | 2.95% | 3.07% | 3.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZAG.TO and CORE.TO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZAG.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZAG.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for CORE.TO.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ZAG.TO and 0.32% for CORE.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZAG.TO and CORE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer