PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZA30.DE vs. SPYL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZA30.DE vs. SPYL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (ZA30.DE) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc) (SPYL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ZA30.DE having a 11.16% return and SPYL.DE slightly higher at 11.37%.


ZA30.DE

1D
0.60%
1M
4.14%
YTD
11.16%
6M
11.11%
1Y
28.45%
3Y*
18.54%
5Y*
10Y*

SPYL.DE

1D
-0.15%
1M
4.36%
YTD
11.37%
6M
10.86%
1Y
25.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZA30.DE vs. SPYL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ZA30.DE
iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc
11.16%5.34%31.19%8.19%
SPYL.DE
State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc)
11.37%4.71%32.33%9.54%

Correlation

The correlation between ZA30.DE and SPYL.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2023

0.98

The correlation between ZA30.DE and SPYL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZA30.DE vs. SPYL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZA30.DE
ZA30.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ZA30.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZA30.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZA30.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ZA30.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZA30.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYL.DE
SPYL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SPYL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZA30.DE vs. SPYL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (ZA30.DE) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc) (SPYL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZA30.DESPYL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.41

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.12

3.58

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.63

12.72

+2.91

ZA30.DE vs. SPYL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZA30.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the SPYL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZA30.DE and SPYL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZA30.DESPYL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

2.21

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

1.54

-0.36

Drawdowns

ZA30.DE vs. SPYL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZA30.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, roughly equal to the maximum SPYL.DE drawdown of -23.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZA30.DE and SPYL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZA30.DESPYL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.45%

-23.27%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.91%

-7.13%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.46%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.22%

-3.24%

+0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

2.01%

-0.18%

Volatility

ZA30.DE vs. SPYL.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (ZA30.DE) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc) (SPYL.DE) have volatilities of 2.73% and 2.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZA30.DESPYL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

2.66%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.54%

7.57%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.54%

11.52%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

14.61%

-0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.38%

14.61%

-0.23%

ZA30.DE vs. SPYL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZA30.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYL.DE's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZA30.DE vs. SPYL.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZA30.DE nor SPYL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, ZA30.DE and SPYL.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SPYL.DE is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPYL.DE is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for ZA30.DE.

ZA30.DE tracks S&P 500 ESG, while SPYL.DE tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for ZA30.DE and 0.03% for SPYL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZA30.DE and SPYL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer