PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZA30.DE vs. IS3Q.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZA30.DE vs. IS3Q.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (ZA30.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3Q.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZA30.DE achieves a 11.16% return, which is significantly higher than IS3Q.DE's 9.47% return.


ZA30.DE

1D
0.60%
1M
4.14%
YTD
11.16%
6M
11.11%
1Y
28.45%
3Y*
18.54%
5Y*
10Y*

IS3Q.DE

1D
0.75%
1M
3.07%
YTD
9.47%
6M
9.57%
1Y
18.81%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
12.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZA30.DE vs. IS3Q.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ZA30.DE
iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc
11.16%5.34%31.19%24.10%-5.78%
IS3Q.DE
iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)
9.47%2.80%23.78%21.70%-2.12%

Correlation

The correlation between ZA30.DE and IS3Q.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2022

0.93

The correlation between ZA30.DE and IS3Q.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZA30.DE vs. IS3Q.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZA30.DE
ZA30.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ZA30.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZA30.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZA30.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ZA30.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZA30.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

IS3Q.DE
IS3Q.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
IS3Q.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3Q.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3Q.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3Q.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3Q.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZA30.DE vs. IS3Q.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (ZA30.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3Q.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZA30.DEIS3Q.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.33

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.12

2.97

+1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.63

11.80

+3.83

ZA30.DE vs. IS3Q.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZA30.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the IS3Q.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZA30.DE and IS3Q.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZA30.DEIS3Q.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

1.76

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

0.76

+0.41

Drawdowns

ZA30.DE vs. IS3Q.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZA30.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, smaller than the maximum IS3Q.DE drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZA30.DE and IS3Q.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZA30.DEIS3Q.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.45%

-32.31%

+8.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.91%

-6.33%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.45%

-20.63%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.12%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.22%

-4.61%

+1.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

1.60%

+0.23%

Volatility

ZA30.DE vs. IS3Q.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (ZA30.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.73% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3Q.DE) at 2.37%. This indicates that ZA30.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IS3Q.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZA30.DEIS3Q.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

2.37%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.54%

7.31%

+0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.54%

10.66%

+0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

14.15%

+0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.38%

14.89%

-0.51%

ZA30.DE vs. IS3Q.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZA30.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IS3Q.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZA30.DE vs. IS3Q.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZA30.DE nor IS3Q.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, ZA30.DE and IS3Q.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ZA30.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZA30.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IS3Q.DE.

ZA30.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while IS3Q.DE is Global Equities. ZA30.DE tracks S&P 500 ESG, while IS3Q.DE tracks MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for ZA30.DE and 0.30% for IS3Q.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZA30.DE and IS3Q.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer