PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZA30.DE vs. AIUT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZA30.DE vs. AIUT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (ZA30.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy II MSCI USA PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc (AIUT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ZA30.DE having a 11.16% return and AIUT.DE slightly higher at 11.57%.


ZA30.DE

1D
0.60%
1M
4.14%
YTD
11.16%
6M
11.11%
1Y
28.45%
3Y*
18.54%
5Y*
10Y*

AIUT.DE

1D
-0.01%
1M
7.35%
YTD
11.57%
6M
10.76%
1Y
23.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZA30.DE vs. AIUT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ZA30.DE
iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc
11.16%5.34%31.19%3.99%
AIUT.DE
BNP Paribas Easy II MSCI USA PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc
11.57%1.03%31.84%5.33%

Correlation

The correlation between ZA30.DE and AIUT.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2023

0.94

The correlation between ZA30.DE and AIUT.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZA30.DE vs. AIUT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZA30.DE
ZA30.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ZA30.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZA30.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZA30.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ZA30.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZA30.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

AIUT.DE
AIUT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
AIUT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIUT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIUT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
AIUT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIUT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZA30.DE vs. AIUT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (ZA30.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy II MSCI USA PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc (AIUT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZA30.DEAIUT.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.33

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.12

2.11

+2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.63

6.23

+9.40

ZA30.DE vs. AIUT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZA30.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the AIUT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZA30.DE and AIUT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZA30.DEAIUT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

1.82

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

1.24

-0.06

Drawdowns

ZA30.DE vs. AIUT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZA30.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, smaller than the maximum AIUT.DE drawdown of -25.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZA30.DE and AIUT.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZA30.DEAIUT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.45%

-25.11%

+1.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.91%

-11.30%

+4.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.33%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.22%

-4.23%

+1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

3.83%

-2.00%

Volatility

ZA30.DE vs. AIUT.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (ZA30.DE) is 2.73%, while BNP Paribas Easy II MSCI USA PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc (AIUT.DE) has a volatility of 3.37%. This indicates that ZA30.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIUT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZA30.DEAIUT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

3.37%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.54%

8.85%

-1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.54%

13.08%

-1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

15.75%

-1.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.38%

15.75%

-1.37%

ZA30.DE vs. AIUT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZA30.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than AIUT.DE's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZA30.DE vs. AIUT.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZA30.DE nor AIUT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, ZA30.DE and AIUT.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ZA30.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZA30.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for AIUT.DE.

ZA30.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while AIUT.DE is ESG. ZA30.DE tracks S&P 500 ESG, while AIUT.DE tracks MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BNP Paribas Easy. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for ZA30.DE and 0.13% for AIUT.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZA30.DE and AIUT.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer