PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZA30.DE vs. 6TVM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZA30.DE vs. 6TVM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (ZA30.DE) and Amundi Core S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Dist (6TVM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZA30.DE achieves a 12.40% return, which is significantly higher than 6TVM.DE's 10.96% return.


ZA30.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
2.14%
YTD
12.40%
6M
12.85%
1Y
29.48%
3Y*
19.31%
5Y*
10Y*

6TVM.DE

1D
-0.91%
1M
0.30%
YTD
10.96%
6M
11.27%
1Y
25.06%
3Y*
19.11%
5Y*
14.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZA30.DE vs. 6TVM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ZA30.DE
iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc
12.40%5.34%31.19%24.10%-6.60%
6TVM.DE
Amundi Core S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Dist
10.96%4.87%32.69%22.58%-8.22%

Correlation

The correlation between ZA30.DE and 6TVM.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2022

0.97

The correlation between ZA30.DE and 6TVM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZA30.DE vs. 6TVM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZA30.DE
ZA30.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ZA30.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZA30.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZA30.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ZA30.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZA30.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

6TVM.DE
6TVM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
6TVM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
6TVM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
6TVM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
6TVM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
6TVM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZA30.DE vs. 6TVM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (ZA30.DE) and Amundi Core S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Dist (6TVM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZA30.DE6TVM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.38

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.28

3.51

+0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.33

12.39

+3.94

ZA30.DE vs. 6TVM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZA30.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the 6TVM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZA30.DE and 6TVM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZA30.DE vs. 6TVM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZA30.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, roughly equal to the maximum 6TVM.DE drawdown of -23.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZA30.DE and 6TVM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZA30.DE6TVM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.45%

-23.37%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.91%

-7.10%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.45%

-23.37%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.91%

+0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.18%

-4.02%

+0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

2.02%

-0.21%

Volatility

ZA30.DE vs. 6TVM.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (ZA30.DE) and Amundi Core S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Dist (6TVM.DE) have volatilities of 3.30% and 3.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZA30.DE6TVM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

3.35%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.02%

8.02%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.93%

11.94%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.40%

15.26%

-0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.40%

15.23%

-0.83%

ZA30.DE vs. 6TVM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZA30.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than 6TVM.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZA30.DE vs. 6TVM.DE - Dividend Comparison

ZA30.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 6TVM.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
6TVM.DE
Amundi Core S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Dist
0.90%1.00%1.28%1.03%2.12%1.08%0.61%
ZA30.DE
iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, ZA30.DE and 6TVM.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, 6TVM.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

6TVM.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for ZA30.DE.

ZA30.DE tracks S&P 500 ESG, while 6TVM.DE tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for ZA30.DE and 0.05% for 6TVM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZA30.DE and 6TVM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer