YXI vs. BMNZ
YXI (ProShares Short FTSE China 50) and BMNZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds - YXI tracks the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-100%) while BMNZ tracks the BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc.. Both are passively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YXI charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for BMNZ.
Performance
YXI vs. BMNZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YXI achieves a 21.26% return, which is significantly lower than BMNZ's 29.97% return.
YXI
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- 12.62%
- YTD
- 21.26%
- 6M
- 21.92%
- 1Y
- 17.82%
- 3Y*
- -8.51%
- 5Y*
- -0.14%
- 10Y*
- -7.45%
BMNZ
- 1D
- 9.79%
- 1M
- 76.32%
- YTD
- 29.97%
- 6M
- 50.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YXI vs. BMNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 21.26% | 6.14% |
BMNZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF | 29.97% | 15.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between YXI and BMNZ is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YXI vs. BMNZ — Risk / Return Rank
YXI
BMNZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
YXI vs. BMNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF (BMNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| YXI | BMNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.78 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
YXI vs. BMNZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YXI drawdown since its inception was -81.15%, which is greater than BMNZ's maximum drawdown of -70.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YXI and BMNZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YXI | BMNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.15% | -70.80% | -10.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.24% | -27.23% | -48.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.38% | -50.65% | -3.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.43% | — | — |
Volatility
YXI vs. BMNZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YXI | BMNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.92% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.69% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.17% | 187.04% | -166.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.49% | 187.04% | -155.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.43% | 187.04% | -159.61% |
YXI vs. BMNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
YXI has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BMNZ's 1.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
YXI vs. BMNZ - Dividend Comparison
YXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, while BMNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMNZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 2.35% | 3.60% | 4.35% | 2.66% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 1.01% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YXI and BMNZ have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, YXI is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
YXI is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for BMNZ.
YXI has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 0.00% for BMNZ.
YXI tracks FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-100%), while BMNZ tracks BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc.. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for YXI and 1.31% for BMNZ.
Find the right allocation for YXI and BMNZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer