PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YTSL.NEO vs. YAMZ.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

YTSL.NEO vs. YAMZ.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Tesla (TSLA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YTSL.NEO) and Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAMZ.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

YTSL.NEO vs. YAMZ.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
YTSL.NEO
Tesla (TSLA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF
-20.27%27.43%46.11%106.56%-20.20%
YAMZ.NEO
Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF
-10.15%9.09%48.13%96.20%-1.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YTSL.NEO achieves a -20.27% return, which is significantly lower than YAMZ.NEO's -10.15% return.


YTSL.NEO

1D
-2.87%
1M
-8.84%
YTD
-20.27%
6M
-5.20%
1Y
54.44%
3Y*
26.23%
5Y*
10Y*

YAMZ.NEO

1D
5.33%
1M
1.41%
YTD
-10.15%
6M
-3.80%
1Y
11.03%
3Y*
31.51%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


YTSL.NEO vs. YAMZ.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

YTSL.NEO has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is lower than YAMZ.NEO's 1.72% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

YTSL.NEO vs. YAMZ.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YTSL.NEO
YTSL.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
YTSL.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YTSL.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
YTSL.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
YTSL.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
YTSL.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

YAMZ.NEO
YAMZ.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
YAMZ.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YAMZ.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
YAMZ.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
YAMZ.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
YAMZ.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YTSL.NEO vs. YAMZ.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tesla (TSLA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YTSL.NEO) and Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAMZ.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YTSL.NEOYAMZ.NEODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.02

0.37

+0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.58

0.77

+0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.10

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

0.69

+1.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.89

1.69

+5.21

YTSL.NEO vs. YAMZ.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YTSL.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the YAMZ.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YTSL.NEO and YAMZ.NEO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YTSL.NEOYAMZ.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

0.37

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

1.08

-0.58

Correlation

The correlation between YTSL.NEO and YAMZ.NEO is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

YTSL.NEO vs. YAMZ.NEO - Dividend Comparison

YTSL.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.99%, more than YAMZ.NEO's 16.63% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
YTSL.NEO
Tesla (TSLA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF
49.99%36.11%12.80%24.07%1.96%
YAMZ.NEO
Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF
16.63%14.12%8.07%7.89%1.02%

Drawdowns

YTSL.NEO vs. YAMZ.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YTSL.NEO drawdown since its inception was -58.40%, which is greater than YAMZ.NEO's maximum drawdown of -34.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YTSL.NEO and YAMZ.NEO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


YTSL.NEOYAMZ.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.40%

-34.37%

-24.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.95%

-21.79%

-2.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.17%

-16.05%

-5.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.85%

-7.38%

-13.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.00%

8.92%

+0.08%

Volatility

YTSL.NEO vs. YAMZ.NEO - Volatility Comparison

Tesla (TSLA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YTSL.NEO) has a higher volatility of 13.40% compared to Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAMZ.NEO) at 11.57%. This indicates that YTSL.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YAMZ.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


YTSL.NEOYAMZ.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.40%

11.57%

+1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.01%

24.93%

+7.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.65%

37.22%

+16.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.79%

34.46%

+28.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.79%

34.46%

+28.33%