PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YSEP vs. XIMR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YSEP vs. XIMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest International Equity Buffer ETF - September (YSEP) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YSEP achieves a 6.05% return, which is significantly higher than XIMR's 4.33% return.


YSEP

1D
0.33%
1M
1.22%
YTD
6.05%
6M
6.45%
1Y
15.80%
3Y*
11.26%
5Y*
10Y*

XIMR

1D
0.13%
1M
0.39%
YTD
4.33%
6M
4.56%
1Y
8.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YSEP vs. XIMR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between YSEP and XIMR is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2024

0.52

The correlation between YSEP and XIMR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YSEP vs. XIMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YSEP
YSEP Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
YSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
YSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
YSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
YSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

XIMR
XIMR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
XIMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIMR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XIMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIMR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YSEP vs. XIMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest International Equity Buffer ETF - September (YSEP) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YSEPXIMRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

2.31

-0.96

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

7.82

-4.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.39

64.09

-52.70

YSEP vs. XIMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YSEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is lower than the XIMR Sharpe Ratio of 4.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YSEP and XIMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YSEP vs. XIMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YSEP drawdown since its inception was -22.58%, which is greater than XIMR's maximum drawdown of -5.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YSEP and XIMR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YSEPXIMRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.58%

-5.12%

-17.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.43%

-1.08%

-4.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.13%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-0.17%

-3.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.36%

0.13%

+1.23%

Volatility

YSEP vs. XIMR - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest International Equity Buffer ETF - September (YSEP) has a higher volatility of 2.29% compared to FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR) at 0.77%. This indicates that YSEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XIMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YSEPXIMRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.29%

0.77%

+1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.42%

1.78%

+4.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.19%

2.07%

+6.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.39%

4.35%

+7.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.39%

4.35%

+7.04%

YSEP vs. XIMR - Expense Ratio Comparison

YSEP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than XIMR's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

YSEP vs. XIMR - Dividend Comparison

YSEP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XIMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%.


Frequently Asked Questions


YSEP and XIMR have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YSEP has higher volatility (2.29%) compared to XIMR (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YSEP dropped -22.58% vs XIMR's -5.12%.

On 1-year performance, YSEP leads with 15.80% vs 8.50% for XIMR. On fees, XIMR is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, XIMR has been the lower-risk option at 0.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, YSEP has performed better with a 15.80% return vs 8.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XIMR is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for YSEP.

XIMR has the higher dividend yield at 6.42%, compared with 0.00% for YSEP.

Their fees differ too: 0.90% for YSEP and 0.85% for XIMR.

XIMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.09 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YSEP and XIMR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer