YQQQ vs. BIGY
YQQQ (YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF) and BIGY ( YieldMax Target 12™ Big 50 Option Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, YQQQ returned -13.84% vs 25.81% for BIGY. At a correlation of -0.88, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
YQQQ vs. BIGY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YQQQ achieves a -8.57% return, which is significantly lower than BIGY's 7.08% return.
YQQQ
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -6.24%
- YTD
- -8.57%
- 6M
- -6.48%
- 1Y
- -13.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BIGY
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 3.13%
- YTD
- 7.08%
- 6M
- 7.27%
- 1Y
- 25.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YQQQ vs. BIGY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
YQQQ YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF | -8.57% | -9.97% | -0.41% |
BIGY YieldMax Target 12™ Big 50 Option Income ETF | 7.08% | 19.14% | 0.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between YQQQ and BIGY is -0.87, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024 | -0.88 |
The correlation between YQQQ and BIGY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.88 to -0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YQQQ vs. BIGY — Risk / Return Rank
YQQQ
BIGY
YQQQ vs. BIGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF (YQQQ) and YieldMax Target 12™ Big 50 Option Income ETF (BIGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YQQQ | BIGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.44 | -0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 3.11 | -3.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.61 | 12.20 | -13.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YQQQ | BIGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.11 | 2.43 | -3.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.76 | 1.05 | -1.81 |
Drawdowns
YQQQ vs. BIGY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YQQQ drawdown since its inception was -28.21%, which is greater than BIGY's maximum drawdown of -18.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YQQQ and BIGY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YQQQ | BIGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.21% | -18.93% | -9.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.82% | -8.34% | -12.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.87% | -0.15% | -27.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.25% | -2.55% | -11.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.62% | 2.12% | +6.50% |
Volatility
YQQQ vs. BIGY - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF (YQQQ) has a higher volatility of 3.90% compared to YieldMax Target 12™ Big 50 Option Income ETF (BIGY) at 1.99%. This indicates that YQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YQQQ | BIGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.90% | 1.99% | +1.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.85% | 7.73% | +2.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.50% | 10.66% | +1.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 16.76% | -0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 16.76% | -0.51% |
YQQQ vs. BIGY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both YQQQ and BIGY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
YQQQ vs. BIGY - Dividend Comparison
YQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 32.16%, more than BIGY's 11.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BIGY YieldMax Target 12™ Big 50 Option Income ETF | 11.65% | 12.49% | 0.00% |
YQQQ YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF | 32.16% | 31.71% | 7.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YQQQ and BIGY have a correlation of -0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YQQQ has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to BIGY (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YQQQ dropped -28.21% vs BIGY's -18.93%.
On 1-year performance, BIGY leads with 25.81% vs -13.84% for YQQQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, BIGY has been the lower-risk option at 1.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BIGY has performed better with a 25.81% return vs -13.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
YQQQ and BIGY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
YQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 32.16%, compared with 11.65% for BIGY.
BIGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs -1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YQQQ and BIGY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer