YPLT.NEO vs. QMVP.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

YPLT.NEO (Palantir (PLTR) Yield Shares Purpose ETF) and QMVP.TO (Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YPLT.NEO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Purpose, while QMVP.TO is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index. YPLT.NEO is actively managed, while QMVP.TO is passively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YPLT.NEO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for QMVP.TO.

Performance

YPLT.NEO vs. QMVP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Palantir (PLTR) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YPLT.NEO) and Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF (QMVP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

YPLT.NEO

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 4.56%
• YTD: -12.90%
• 6M: -13.41%
• 1Y: 23.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QMVP.TO

• 1D: -1.07%
• 1M: 12.73%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YPLT.NEO vs. QMVP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
YPLT.NEO Palantir (PLTR) Yield Shares Purpose ETF	-5.49%
QMVP.TO Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF	25.75%

Correlation

The correlation between YPLT.NEO and QMVP.TO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026	0.32

Return for Risk

YPLT.NEO vs. QMVP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YPLT.NEO

YPLT.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 17
YPLT.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
YPLT.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
YPLT.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 20
YPLT.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
YPLT.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YPLT.NEO vs. QMVP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palantir (PLTR) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YPLT.NEO) and Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF (QMVP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	YPLT.NEO	QMVP.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.38	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.95	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.55	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.23	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	YPLT.NEO	QMVP.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	3.99	-3.54

Drawdowns

YPLT.NEO vs. QMVP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YPLT.NEO drawdown since its inception was -41.92%, which is greater than QMVP.TO's maximum drawdown of -12.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YPLT.NEO and QMVP.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	YPLT.NEO	QMVP.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.92%	-12.77%	-29.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.92%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.50%	-1.07%	-25.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.41%	-3.83%	-11.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.82%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	YPLT.NEO	QMVP.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.68%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.56%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.49%	21.69%	+38.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	69.27%	21.69%	+47.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.27%	21.69%	+47.58%

YPLT.NEO vs. QMVP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

YPLT.NEO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than QMVP.TO's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

YPLT.NEO vs. QMVP.TO - Dividend Comparison

YPLT.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 47.84%, more than QMVP.TO's 0.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
QMVP.TO Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF	0.20%	0.00%
YPLT.NEO Palantir (PLTR) Yield Shares Purpose ETF	47.84%	14.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YPLT.NEO and QMVP.TO in my portfolio?

YPLT.NEO and QMVP.TO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, YPLT.NEO or QMVP.TO?

On fees, QMVP.TO is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, YPLT.NEO or QMVP.TO?

QMVP.TO is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for YPLT.NEO.

What is the main difference between YPLT.NEO and QMVP.TO?

YPLT.NEO is categorized as Derivative Income, while QMVP.TO is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Purpose and Hamilton. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for YPLT.NEO and 0.19% for QMVP.TO.