YPLT.NEO vs. HPF.TO
YPLT.NEO (Palantir (PLTR) Yield Shares Purpose ETF) and HPF.TO (Harvest Energy Leaders Income ETF Class A CAD Hedged) are both exchange-traded funds - YPLT.NEO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Purpose, while HPF.TO is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Harvest. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, YPLT.NEO returned -6.93% vs 41.27% for HPF.TO. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
YPLT.NEO vs. HPF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YPLT.NEO achieves a -19.11% return, which is significantly lower than HPF.TO's 31.82% return.
YPLT.NEO
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -1.87%
- 6M
- -15.77%
- YTD
- -19.11%
- 1Y
- -6.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HPF.TO
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 6.87%
- 6M
- 26.38%
- YTD
- 31.82%
- 1Y
- 41.27%
- 3Y*
- 14.64%
- 5Y*
- 17.23%
- 10Y*
- 5.28%
YPLT.NEO vs. HPF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YPLT.NEO Palantir (PLTR) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | -19.11% | 62.74% |
HPF.TO Harvest Energy Leaders Income ETF Class A CAD Hedged | 31.82% | 3.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between YPLT.NEO and HPF.TO is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YPLT.NEO vs. HPF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
YPLT.NEO
HPF.TO
YPLT.NEO vs. HPF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palantir (PLTR) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YPLT.NEO) and Harvest Energy Leaders Income ETF Class A CAD Hedged (HPF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| YPLT.NEO | HPF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.35 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | 3.45 | -3.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.31 | 10.17 | -10.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
YPLT.NEO vs. HPF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YPLT.NEO drawdown since its inception was -42.43%, smaller than the maximum HPF.TO drawdown of -72.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YPLT.NEO and HPF.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YPLT.NEO | HPF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.43% | -72.97% | +30.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.43% | -12.01% | -30.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -69.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.73% | -3.42% | -28.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.94% | -26.26% | +9.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.12% | 4.07% | +18.05% |
Volatility
YPLT.NEO vs. HPF.TO - Volatility Comparison
Palantir (PLTR) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YPLT.NEO) has a higher volatility of 18.79% compared to Harvest Energy Leaders Income ETF Class A CAD Hedged (HPF.TO) at 6.39%. This indicates that YPLT.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HPF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YPLT.NEO | HPF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.79% | 6.39% | +12.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.30% | 16.32% | +31.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.97% | 19.73% | +42.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.98% | 23.63% | +45.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.98% | 28.03% | +40.95% |
Dividends
YPLT.NEO vs. HPF.TO - Dividend Comparison
YPLT.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 56.00%, more than HPF.TO's 7.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPF.TO Harvest Energy Leaders Income ETF Class A CAD Hedged | 7.85% | 9.93% | 9.80% | 8.75% | 6.58% | 4.61% | 15.32% | 8.74% | 8.78% | 12.87% | 13.58% | 13.31% |
YPLT.NEO Palantir (PLTR) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 56.00% | 14.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YPLT.NEO and HPF.TO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YPLT.NEO is categorized as Derivative Income, while HPF.TO is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Purpose and Harvest.
Find the right allocation for YPLT.NEO and HPF.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer