YPLT.NEO vs. GOGY.TO
YPLT.NEO (Palantir (PLTR) Yield Shares Purpose ETF) and GOGY.TO (Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, YPLT.NEO returned 23.07% vs 132.30% for GOGY.TO. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
YPLT.NEO vs. GOGY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YPLT.NEO achieves a -12.90% return, which is significantly lower than GOGY.TO's 19.65% return.
YPLT.NEO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 4.56%
- YTD
- -12.90%
- 6M
- -13.41%
- 1Y
- 23.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOGY.TO
- 1D
- 4.65%
- 1M
- -2.52%
- YTD
- 19.65%
- 6M
- 16.71%
- 1Y
- 132.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YPLT.NEO vs. GOGY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YPLT.NEO Palantir (PLTR) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | -12.90% | 111.15% |
GOGY.TO Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 19.65% | 80.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between YPLT.NEO and GOGY.TO is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YPLT.NEO vs. GOGY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
YPLT.NEO
GOGY.TO
YPLT.NEO vs. GOGY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palantir (PLTR) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YPLT.NEO) and Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (GOGY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YPLT.NEO | GOGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.64 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 6.61 | -6.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.23 | 24.24 | -23.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YPLT.NEO | GOGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | 4.31 | -3.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 2.48 | -2.03 |
Drawdowns
YPLT.NEO vs. GOGY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YPLT.NEO drawdown since its inception was -41.92%, which is greater than GOGY.TO's maximum drawdown of -20.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YPLT.NEO and GOGY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YPLT.NEO | GOGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.92% | -20.87% | -21.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.92% | -20.14% | -21.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.50% | -6.41% | -20.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.41% | -5.08% | -10.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.82% | 5.48% | +13.34% |
Volatility
YPLT.NEO vs. GOGY.TO - Volatility Comparison
Palantir (PLTR) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YPLT.NEO) has a higher volatility of 13.68% compared to Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (GOGY.TO) at 10.24%. This indicates that YPLT.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOGY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YPLT.NEO | GOGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.68% | 10.24% | +3.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.56% | 21.87% | +23.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.49% | 30.90% | +29.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.27% | 34.78% | +34.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.27% | 34.78% | +34.49% |
YPLT.NEO vs. GOGY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both YPLT.NEO and GOGY.TO have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
YPLT.NEO vs. GOGY.TO - Dividend Comparison
YPLT.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 47.84%, more than GOGY.TO's 12.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GOGY.TO Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 12.21% | 8.04% |
YPLT.NEO Palantir (PLTR) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 47.84% | 14.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YPLT.NEO and GOGY.TO have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
YPLT.NEO and GOGY.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
They also come from different issuers: Purpose and Harvest.
Find the right allocation for YPLT.NEO and GOGY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer