YNVD.NEO vs. NXF.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

YNVD.NEO (NVIDIA (NVDA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF) and NXF.TO (CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged)) are both exchange-traded funds - YNVD.NEO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Purpose Investments, while NXF.TO is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by CI. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, YNVD.NEO returned 72.69% vs 47.32% for NXF.TO. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

YNVD.NEO vs. NXF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in NVIDIA (NVDA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YNVD.NEO) and CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged) (NXF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YNVD.NEO achieves a 20.36% return, which is significantly lower than NXF.TO's 31.66% return.

YNVD.NEO

• 1D: 2.83%
• 1M: 14.32%
• YTD: 20.36%
• 6M: 28.67%
• 1Y: 72.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NXF.TO

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: -2.61%
• YTD: 31.66%
• 6M: 28.51%
• 1Y: 47.32%
• 3Y*: 15.61%
• 5Y*: 17.26%
• 10Y*: 8.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YNVD.NEO vs. NXF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
YNVD.NEO NVIDIA (NVDA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF	20.36%	44.51%	133.89%
NXF.TO CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged)	31.66%	9.19%	-0.22%

Correlation

The correlation between YNVD.NEO and NXF.TO is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2024	0.04

The correlation between YNVD.NEO and NXF.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

YNVD.NEO vs. NXF.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	YNVD.NEO	NXF.TO
Technology	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	100.0%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

YNVD.NEO vs. NXF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YNVD.NEO

YNVD.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 65
YNVD.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
YNVD.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
YNVD.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 57
YNVD.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
YNVD.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 67

NXF.TO

NXF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 75
NXF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
NXF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
NXF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 67
NXF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
NXF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YNVD.NEO vs. NXF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA (NVDA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YNVD.NEO) and CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged) (NXF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	YNVD.NEO	NXF.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	2.44	-0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	3.12	-0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.40	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.45	5.05	-0.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.10	14.32	-2.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

YNVD.NEO vs. NXF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YNVD.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the NXF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YNVD.NEO and NXF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	YNVD.NEO	NXF.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.06	2.44	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.31	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.54	0.22	+1.33

Drawdowns

YNVD.NEO vs. NXF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YNVD.NEO drawdown since its inception was -41.02%, smaller than the maximum NXF.TO drawdown of -65.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YNVD.NEO and NXF.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	YNVD.NEO	NXF.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.02%	-65.25%	+24.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.41%	-9.41%	-7.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.26%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.26%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-65.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.57%	-5.56%	+3.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.81%	-16.04%	+7.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.03%	3.31%	+2.72%

Volatility

YNVD.NEO vs. NXF.TO - Volatility Comparison

NVIDIA (NVDA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YNVD.NEO) has a higher volatility of 13.14% compared to CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged) (NXF.TO) at 7.56%. This indicates that YNVD.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NXF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YNVD.NEO	NXF.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.14%	7.56%	+5.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.65%	15.63%	+12.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.48%	19.53%	+15.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.45%	23.39%	+29.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.45%	26.15%	+26.30%

Dividends

YNVD.NEO vs. NXF.TO - Dividend Comparison

YNVD.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.18%, more than NXF.TO's 8.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NXF.TO CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged)	8.09%	7.70%	8.50%	8.60%	11.22%	9.48%	11.23%	7.83%	9.38%	6.50%	8.24%	8.05%
YNVD.NEO NVIDIA (NVDA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF	21.18%	23.48%	17.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YNVD.NEO and NXF.TO in my portfolio?

YNVD.NEO and NXF.TO have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between YNVD.NEO and NXF.TO?

YNVD.NEO is categorized as Derivative Income, while NXF.TO is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Purpose Investments and CI.