PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YNVD.NEO vs. HUTE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

YNVD.NEO vs. HUTE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in NVIDIA (NVDA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YNVD.NEO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

YNVD.NEO vs. HUTE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
YNVD.NEO
NVIDIA (NVDA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF
-5.25%44.51%133.89%
HUTE.TO
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF
12.55%19.04%17.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YNVD.NEO achieves a -5.25% return, which is significantly lower than HUTE.TO's 12.55% return.


YNVD.NEO

1D
6.02%
1M
-2.45%
YTD
-5.25%
6M
0.54%
1Y
76.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HUTE.TO

1D
-1.14%
1M
-2.25%
YTD
12.55%
6M
13.89%
1Y
21.46%
3Y*
14.98%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


YNVD.NEO vs. HUTE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

YNVD.NEO has a 1.94% expense ratio, which is higher than HUTE.TO's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

YNVD.NEO vs. HUTE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YNVD.NEO
YNVD.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
YNVD.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YNVD.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
YNVD.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
YNVD.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
YNVD.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

HUTE.TO
HUTE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
HUTE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUTE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUTE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
HUTE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUTE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YNVD.NEO vs. HUTE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA (NVDA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YNVD.NEO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YNVD.NEOHUTE.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.79

1.55

+0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.44

2.04

+0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.32

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.28

2.37

+1.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.85

9.38

+2.46

YNVD.NEO vs. HUTE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YNVD.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the HUTE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YNVD.NEO and HUTE.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YNVD.NEOHUTE.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

1.55

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.31

1.17

+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between YNVD.NEO and HUTE.TO is -0.06. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

YNVD.NEO vs. HUTE.TO - Dividend Comparison

YNVD.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.10%, more than HUTE.TO's 8.09% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
YNVD.NEO
NVIDIA (NVDA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF
26.10%23.48%17.81%0.00%0.00%
HUTE.TO
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF
8.09%9.64%10.24%10.70%1.61%

Drawdowns

YNVD.NEO vs. HUTE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YNVD.NEO drawdown since its inception was -41.02%, which is greater than HUTE.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YNVD.NEO and HUTE.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


YNVD.NEOHUTE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.02%

-18.36%

-22.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.30%

-9.03%

-8.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.21%

-2.57%

-8.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.25%

-3.94%

-5.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.25%

2.29%

+3.96%

Volatility

YNVD.NEO vs. HUTE.TO - Volatility Comparison

NVIDIA (NVDA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YNVD.NEO) has a higher volatility of 12.55% compared to Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO) at 4.61%. This indicates that YNVD.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HUTE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


YNVD.NEOHUTE.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.55%

4.61%

+7.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.62%

7.87%

+19.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.19%

13.94%

+29.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.40%

14.26%

+39.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.40%

14.26%

+39.14%