YMAP.L vs. HNSS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about YieldMax Big Tech Option Income UCITS ETF (YMAP.L) and HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF (HNSS.L).
YMAP.L and HNSS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. YMAP.L is an actively managed fund by YieldMax. It was launched on Mar 25, 2025. HNSS.L is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Global Semiconductor Index. It was launched on Jan 25, 2022.
Performance
YMAP.L vs. HNSS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
YMAP.L vs. HNSS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YMAP.L YieldMax Big Tech Option Income UCITS ETF | -13.45% | 17.95% |
HNSS.L HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF | 15.32% | 69.82% |
Different Trading Currencies
YMAP.L is traded in GBp, while HNSS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HNSS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YMAP.L achieves a -13.45% return, which is significantly lower than HNSS.L's 15.32% return.
YMAP.L
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- -13.45%
- 6M
- -15.55%
- 1Y
- 1.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HNSS.L
- 1D
- 5.93%
- 1M
- -3.90%
- YTD
- 15.32%
- 6M
- 34.46%
- 1Y
- 96.10%
- 3Y*
- 37.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
YMAP.L vs. HNSS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
YMAP.L has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than HNSS.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
YMAP.L vs. HNSS.L — Risk / Return Rank
YMAP.L
HNSS.L
YMAP.L vs. HNSS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Big Tech Option Income UCITS ETF (YMAP.L) and HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF (HNSS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YMAP.L | HNSS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.08 | 2.94 | -2.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.25 | 3.44 | -3.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.45 | -0.42 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.07 | 7.26 | -7.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.16 | 24.78 | -24.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YMAP.L | HNSS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 | 2.94 | -2.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.88 | -0.78 |
Correlation
The correlation between YMAP.L and HNSS.L is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
YMAP.L vs. HNSS.L - Dividend Comparison
YMAP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.15%, while HNSS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YMAP.L YieldMax Big Tech Option Income UCITS ETF | 25.15% | 17.21% |
HNSS.L HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
YMAP.L vs. HNSS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YMAP.L drawdown since its inception was -22.57%, smaller than the maximum HNSS.L drawdown of -36.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMAP.L and HNSS.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| YMAP.L | HNSS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.57% | -36.83% | +14.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.57% | -14.21% | -8.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.78% | -7.68% | -13.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.32% | -9.88% | +3.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.23% | 3.85% | +5.38% |
Volatility
YMAP.L vs. HNSS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax Big Tech Option Income UCITS ETF (YMAP.L) is 4.65%, while HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF (HNSS.L) has a volatility of 10.42%. This indicates that YMAP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HNSS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| YMAP.L | HNSS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.65% | 10.42% | -5.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.67% | 23.25% | -9.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.90% | 32.53% | -11.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.88% | 29.41% | -8.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.88% | 29.41% | -8.53% |