PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YJUN vs. FBUF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YJUN vs. FBUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – June (YJUN) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YJUN achieves a 4.59% return, which is significantly lower than FBUF's 5.32% return.


YJUN

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.63%
YTD
4.59%
6M
5.76%
1Y
9.95%
3Y*
9.88%
5Y*
10Y*

FBUF

1D
-0.12%
1M
2.85%
YTD
5.32%
6M
6.28%
1Y
19.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YJUN vs. FBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between YJUN and FBUF is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2024

0.60

The correlation between YJUN and FBUF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YJUN vs. FBUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YJUN
YJUN Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
YJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
YJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
YJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
YJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

FBUF
FBUF Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YJUN vs. FBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – June (YJUN) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YJUNFBUFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.53

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

3.51

-1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.91

15.68

-6.77

YJUN vs. FBUF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YJUN Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the FBUF Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YJUN and FBUF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YJUNFBUFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

2.63

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

1.47

-0.92

Drawdowns

YJUN vs. FBUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YJUN drawdown since its inception was -21.53%, which is greater than FBUF's maximum drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YJUN and FBUF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YJUNFBUFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.53%

-11.09%

-10.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.16%

-5.61%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-0.22%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-1.38%

-2.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

1.25%

-0.13%

Volatility

YJUN vs. FBUF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – June (YJUN) is 1.03%, while Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) has a volatility of 1.11%. This indicates that YJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBUF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YJUNFBUFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

1.11%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.61%

5.37%

-0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.53%

7.49%

-0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.03%

9.55%

+1.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.03%

9.55%

+1.48%

YJUN vs. FBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

YJUN has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FBUF's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

YJUN vs. FBUF - Dividend Comparison

YJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.


Frequently Asked Questions


YJUN and FBUF have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBUF has higher volatility (1.11%) compared to YJUN (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YJUN dropped -21.53% vs FBUF's -11.09%.

On 1-year performance, FBUF leads with 19.61% vs 9.95% for YJUN. On fees, FBUF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FBUF has performed better with a 19.61% return vs 9.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FBUF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for YJUN.

FBUF has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.00% for YJUN.

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for YJUN and 0.48% for FBUF.

FBUF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YJUN and FBUF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer