YJUN vs. ACLO

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

YJUN (FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – June) and ACLO (TCW AAA CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YJUN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Index, while ACLO is a CLO fund actively managed by TCW. YJUN is passively managed, while ACLO is actively managed. Over the past year, YJUN returned 11.71% vs 5.31% for ACLO. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. YJUN charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ACLO.

Performance

YJUN vs. ACLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – June (YJUN) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YJUN achieves a 4.94% return, which is significantly higher than ACLO's 2.41% return.

YJUN

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 0.58%
• YTD: 4.94%
• 6M: 5.27%
• 1Y: 11.71%
• 3Y*: 10.11%
• 5Y*: 6.04%
• 10Y*: —

ACLO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 2.41%
• 6M: 2.53%
• 1Y: 5.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YJUN vs. ACLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
YJUN FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – June	4.94%	18.77%	-0.51%
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF	2.41%	5.32%	0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between YJUN and ACLO is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2024	-0.01

The correlation between YJUN and ACLO shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

YJUN vs. ACLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YJUN

YJUN Risk / Return Rank: 62
YJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
YJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
YJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 64
YJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
YJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 66

ACLO

ACLO Risk / Return Rank: 99
ACLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YJUN vs. ACLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – June (YJUN) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	YJUN	ACLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	7.32	-5.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.83	15.16	-12.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	3.44	-2.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	19.90	-17.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.72	165.46	-153.75

YJUN vs. ACLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YJUN Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is lower than the ACLO Sharpe Ratio of 7.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YJUN and ACLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

YJUN vs. ACLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YJUN drawdown since its inception was -21.53%, which is greater than ACLO's maximum drawdown of -1.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YJUN and ACLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	YJUN	ACLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.53%	-1.01%	-20.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.16%	-0.27%	-3.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.75%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.33%	0.00%	-0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.76%	-0.04%	-3.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.00%	0.03%	+0.97%

Volatility

YJUN vs. ACLO - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – June (YJUN) has a higher volatility of 1.00% compared to TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) at 0.19%. This indicates that YJUN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YJUN	ACLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.00%	0.19%	+0.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.61%	0.58%	+4.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.15%	0.73%	+5.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.99%	1.07%	+9.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.99%	1.07%	+9.92%

YJUN vs. ACLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

YJUN has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than ACLO's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

YJUN vs. ACLO - Dividend Comparison

YJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF	4.90%	4.87%	0.59%
YJUN FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – June	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YJUN and ACLO in my portfolio?

YJUN and ACLO have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, YJUN or ACLO?

YJUN has higher volatility (1.00%) compared to ACLO (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YJUN dropped -21.53% vs ACLO's -1.01%.

Which ETF is better, YJUN or ACLO?

On 1-year performance, YJUN leads with 11.71% vs 5.31% for ACLO. On fees, ACLO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ACLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, YJUN or ACLO?

Over the 1-year period, YJUN has performed better with a 11.71% return vs 5.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, YJUN or ACLO?

ACLO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for YJUN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, YJUN or ACLO?

ACLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 0.00% for YJUN.

What is the main difference between YJUN and ACLO?

YJUN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while ACLO is CLO. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for YJUN and 0.20% for ACLO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.32 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.