PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YFSIX vs. PRILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YFSIX vs. PRILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX) and Parnassus Core Equity Institutional Shares (PRILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YFSIX achieves a 27.94% return, which is significantly higher than PRILX's 6.81% return.


YFSIX

1D
-0.24%
1M
5.24%
YTD
27.94%
6M
15.38%
1Y
32.86%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*

PRILX

1D
0.10%
1M
4.12%
YTD
6.81%
6M
6.01%
1Y
15.25%
3Y*
16.80%
5Y*
10.55%
10Y*
13.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YFSIX vs. PRILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YFSIX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund
27.94%14.91%-0.34%16.64%-9.15%13.13%18.46%24.40%2.18%20.95%
PRILX
Parnassus Core Equity Institutional Shares
6.81%11.91%18.81%25.25%-18.47%27.86%21.50%30.95%-0.06%15.17%

Correlation

The correlation between YFSIX and PRILX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2017

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between YFSIX and PRILX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YFSIX vs. PRILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YFSIX
YFSIX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
YFSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YFSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
YFSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
YFSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
YFSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

PRILX
PRILX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
PRILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRILX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
PRILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRILX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YFSIX vs. PRILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX) and Parnassus Core Equity Institutional Shares (PRILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YFSIXPRILXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.54

1.38

+0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.70

1.97

-0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.24

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

1.39

+0.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.30

5.44

+1.86

YFSIX vs. PRILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YFSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the PRILX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YFSIX and PRILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YFSIXPRILXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

1.38

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.65

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.66

+0.16

Drawdowns

YFSIX vs. PRILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YFSIX drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, smaller than the maximum PRILX drawdown of -42.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YFSIX and PRILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YFSIXPRILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.10%

-42.00%

+6.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.20%

-11.61%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.20%

-16.28%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.14%

-26.18%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

0.00%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-4.65%

-0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.47%

2.96%

+1.51%

Volatility

YFSIX vs. PRILX - Volatility Comparison

AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX) has a higher volatility of 5.82% compared to Parnassus Core Equity Institutional Shares (PRILX) at 3.03%. This indicates that YFSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YFSIXPRILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.82%

3.03%

+2.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.77%

9.10%

+11.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.35%

11.76%

+9.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.39%

16.24%

-0.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.25%

17.25%

-1.00%

YFSIX vs. PRILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

YFSIX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than PRILX's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

YFSIX vs. PRILX - Dividend Comparison

YFSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.90%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRILX
Parnassus Core Equity Institutional Shares
17.90%19.16%10.17%6.18%10.34%7.94%6.04%8.23%9.89%7.37%3.99%9.84%
YFSIX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund
0.00%0.00%8.68%8.02%4.32%8.18%4.76%6.59%0.71%2.63%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YFSIX and PRILX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YFSIX has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to PRILX (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YFSIX dropped -35.10% vs PRILX's -42.00%.

YFSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YFSIX and PRILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer