YETH vs. TSLW
YETH (Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF) and TSLW (Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, YETH returned -37.52% vs 7.72% for TSLW. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YETH charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for TSLW.
Performance
YETH vs. TSLW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YETH achieves a -29.17% return, which is significantly lower than TSLW's -23.54% return.
YETH
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- 9.78%
- 6M
- -33.82%
- YTD
- -29.17%
- 1Y
- -37.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -23.46%
TSLW
- 1D
- -3.56%
- 1M
- -9.65%
- 6M
- -20.90%
- YTD
- -23.54%
- 1Y
- 7.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.04%
YETH vs. TSLW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YETH Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF | -29.17% | 7.46% |
TSLW Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF | -23.54% | 35.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between YETH and TSLW is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YETH vs. TSLW — Risk / Return Rank
YETH
TSLW
YETH vs. TSLW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF (YETH) and Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| YETH | TSLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.07 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | 0.22 | -0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | 0.45 | -1.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
YETH vs. TSLW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YETH drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, which is greater than TSLW's maximum drawdown of -35.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YETH and TSLW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YETH | TSLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.41% | -35.80% | -28.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -58.73% | -35.80% | -22.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.73% | -31.09% | -25.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.83% | -14.09% | -18.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.32% | 17.35% | +18.97% |
Volatility
YETH vs. TSLW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF (YETH) is 10.41%, while Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) has a volatility of 20.20%. This indicates that YETH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YETH | TSLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.41% | 20.20% | -9.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.19% | 37.55% | +2.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.84% | 53.50% | +4.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.15% | 56.94% | -1.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.15% | 56.94% | -1.79% |
YETH vs. TSLW - Expense Ratio Comparison
YETH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
YETH vs. TSLW - Dividend Comparison
YETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 124.40%, more than TSLW's 101.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
TSLW Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF | 101.07% | 49.31% | 0.00% |
YETH Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF | 124.40% | 109.12% | 20.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YETH and TSLW have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLW has higher volatility (20.20%) compared to YETH (10.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YETH dropped -64.41% vs TSLW's -35.80%.
On 1-year performance, TSLW leads with 7.72% vs -37.52% for YETH. On fees, YETH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, YETH has been the lower-risk option at 10.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLW has performed better with a 7.72% return vs -37.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
YETH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSLW.
YETH has the higher dividend yield at 124.40%, compared with 101.07% for TSLW.
Their fees differ too: 0.95% for YETH and 0.99% for TSLW.
TSLW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YETH and TSLW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer