PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YETH vs. FTQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YETH vs. FTQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF (YETH) and First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YETH achieves a -30.51% return, which is significantly lower than FTQI's 12.76% return.


YETH

1D
-0.68%
1M
6.37%
6M
-35.94%
YTD
-30.51%
1Y
-37.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTQI

1D
-0.72%
1M
1.28%
6M
11.68%
YTD
12.76%
1Y
26.34%
3Y*
16.62%
5Y*
12.26%
10Y*
7.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YETH vs. FTQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
YETH
Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF
-30.51%-32.10%26.02%
FTQI
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
12.76%12.68%8.74%

Correlation

The correlation between YETH and FTQI is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YETH vs. FTQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YETH
YETH Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
YETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
YETH Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
YETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
YETH Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

FTQI
FTQI Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FTQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTQI Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FTQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTQI Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YETH vs. FTQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF (YETH) and First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YETHFTQIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.45

-0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.64

4.24

-4.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.04

20.07

-21.11

YETH vs. FTQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YETH Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the FTQI Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YETH and FTQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YETH vs. FTQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YETH drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, which is greater than FTQI's maximum drawdown of -19.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YETH and FTQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YETHFTQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.41%

-19.42%

-44.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-58.73%

-6.24%

-52.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.55%

-0.85%

-56.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.72%

-3.73%

-28.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.04%

1.32%

+34.72%

Volatility

YETH vs. FTQI - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF (YETH) has a higher volatility of 10.28% compared to First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) at 2.92%. This indicates that YETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YETHFTQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.28%

2.92%

+7.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.14%

8.83%

+31.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.87%

10.87%

+47.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.25%

14.82%

+40.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.25%

12.98%

+42.27%

YETH vs. FTQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

YETH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FTQI's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

YETH vs. FTQI - Dividend Comparison

YETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 126.80%, more than FTQI's 10.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTQI
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
10.92%11.46%11.66%11.49%9.85%3.05%3.27%2.95%3.27%2.74%3.02%3.54%
YETH
Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF
126.80%109.12%20.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YETH and FTQI have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YETH has higher volatility (10.28%) compared to FTQI (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YETH dropped -64.41% vs FTQI's -19.42%.

On 1-year performance, FTQI leads with 26.34% vs -37.48% for YETH. On fees, FTQI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, FTQI has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FTQI has performed better with a 26.34% return vs -37.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTQI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for YETH.

YETH has the higher dividend yield at 126.80%, compared with 10.92% for FTQI.

YETH is categorized as Derivative Income, while FTQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for YETH and 0.75% for FTQI.

FTQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YETH and FTQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer