YCST.NEO vs. HUTE.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YCST.NEO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO).
YCST.NEO and HUTE.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. YCST.NEO is an actively managed fund by Purpose Investments. It was launched on Feb 20, 2025. HUTE.TO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Oct 25, 2022.
Performance
YCST.NEO vs. HUTE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
YCST.NEO vs. HUTE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YCST.NEO Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 14.50% | -23.79% |
HUTE.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF | 14.32% | 14.31% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with YCST.NEO having a 14.50% return and HUTE.TO slightly lower at 14.32%.
YCST.NEO
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 14.50%
- 6M
- 4.79%
- 1Y
- -3.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HUTE.TO
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 14.32%
- 6M
- 16.10%
- 1Y
- 23.48%
- 3Y*
- 15.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
YCST.NEO vs. HUTE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
YCST.NEO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HUTE.TO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
YCST.NEO vs. HUTE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
YCST.NEO
HUTE.TO
YCST.NEO vs. HUTE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YCST.NEO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YCST.NEO | HUTE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | 1.70 | -1.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | 2.22 | -2.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.35 | -0.36 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 2.55 | -2.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.13 | 10.03 | -10.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YCST.NEO | HUTE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 | 1.70 | -1.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.49 | 1.21 | -1.69 |
Correlation
The correlation between YCST.NEO and HUTE.TO is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
YCST.NEO vs. HUTE.TO - Dividend Comparison
YCST.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HUTE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.80%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YCST.NEO Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HUTE.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF | 8.80% | 9.64% | 10.24% | 10.70% | 1.61% |
Drawdowns
YCST.NEO vs. HUTE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YCST.NEO drawdown since its inception was -25.53%, which is greater than HUTE.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YCST.NEO and HUTE.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| YCST.NEO | HUTE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.53% | -18.36% | -7.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.19% | -8.95% | -15.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.93% | -1.04% | -12.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.34% | -3.93% | -9.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.02% | 2.27% | +10.75% |
Volatility
YCST.NEO vs. HUTE.TO - Volatility Comparison
Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YCST.NEO) has a higher volatility of 5.46% compared to Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO) at 4.23%. This indicates that YCST.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HUTE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| YCST.NEO | HUTE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | 4.23% | +1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.25% | 7.81% | +7.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.81% | 13.91% | +7.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.83% | 14.24% | +9.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.83% | 14.24% | +9.59% |