YCSH.DE vs. PPFB.DE
YCSH.DE (iShares € Cash UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and PPFB.DE (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - YCSH.DE is a Money Market fund actively managed by iShares, while PPFB.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold. YCSH.DE is actively managed, while PPFB.DE is passively managed. Over the past year, YCSH.DE returned 1.99% vs 30.20% for PPFB.DE. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YCSH.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for PPFB.DE.
Performance
YCSH.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YCSH.DE achieves a 0.84% return, which is significantly lower than PPFB.DE's 2.74% return.
YCSH.DE
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 0.84%
- 6M
- 1.00%
- 1Y
- 1.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PPFB.DE
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 6.39%
- 1Y
- 30.20%
- 3Y*
- 28.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YCSH.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
YCSH.DE iShares € Cash UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 0.84% | 2.26% | 0.27% |
PPFB.DE iShares Physical Gold ETC | 2.74% | 49.11% | 0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between YCSH.DE and PPFB.DE is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2024 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YCSH.DE vs. PPFB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
YCSH.DE
PPFB.DE
YCSH.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Cash UCITS ETF EUR Acc (YCSH.DE) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YCSH.DE | PPFB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +16.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +46.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 13.76 | 1.26 | +12.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 87.60 | 1.81 | +85.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 771.43 | 4.60 | +766.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YCSH.DE | PPFB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.42 | 1.30 | +16.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 11.33 | 1.26 | +10.07 |
Drawdowns
YCSH.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YCSH.DE drawdown since its inception was -0.07%, smaller than the maximum PPFB.DE drawdown of -16.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YCSH.DE and PPFB.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YCSH.DE | PPFB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.07% | -16.60% | +16.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.02% | -16.60% | +16.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -15.00% | +15.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -4.40% | +4.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 6.55% | -6.55% |
Volatility
YCSH.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares € Cash UCITS ETF EUR Acc (YCSH.DE) is 0.04%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that YCSH.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPFB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YCSH.DE | PPFB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.04% | 5.11% | -5.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.09% | 20.18% | -20.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11% | 23.12% | -23.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.20% | 16.13% | -15.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.20% | 16.13% | -15.93% |
YCSH.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
YCSH.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than PPFB.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
YCSH.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither YCSH.DE nor PPFB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
YCSH.DE and PPFB.DE have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, YCSH.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
YCSH.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for PPFB.DE.
YCSH.DE is categorized as Money Market, while PPFB.DE is Precious Metals. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for YCSH.DE and 0.12% for PPFB.DE.
Find the right allocation for YCSH.DE and PPFB.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer