PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YCS vs. XTAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YCS vs. XTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YCS achieves a 5.40% return, which is significantly lower than XTAP's 13.57% return.


YCS

1D
-0.02%
1M
-4.94%
6M
4.42%
YTD
5.40%
1Y
22.68%
3Y*
17.44%
5Y*
22.89%
10Y*
13.35%
ALL TIME*
6.33%

XTAP

1D
0.06%
1M
1.56%
6M
12.99%
YTD
13.57%
1Y
19.55%
3Y*
17.54%
5Y*
10.86%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$38.30K$26.56K$25.98K
$2.59M$2.15M$1.60M

YCS vs. XTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
5.40%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%6.74%
XTAP
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF
13.57%17.58%14.26%23.46%-14.68%12.26%

Correlation

The correlation between YCS and XTAP is -0.13, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021

-0.01

The correlation between YCS and XTAP shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to -0.01 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YCS vs. XTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

XTAP
XTAP Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

YCS vs. XTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YCSXTAPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

2.03

-0.75

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

11.44

-8.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.73

58.57

-48.84

YCS vs. XTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YCS Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the XTAP Sharpe Ratio of 4.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YCS and XTAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YCS vs. XTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YCS drawdown since its inception was -49.56%, which is greater than XTAP's maximum drawdown of -22.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YCS and XTAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YCSXTAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.56%

-22.13%

-27.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.48%

-1.72%

-6.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.05%

-11.83%

-11.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.32%

-22.13%

-5.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.34%

0.00%

-7.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.75%

-3.35%

-16.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

0.33%

+2.01%

Volatility

YCS vs. XTAP - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a higher volatility of 5.95% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) at 1.64%. This indicates that YCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YCSXTAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.95%

1.64%

+4.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.87%

4.04%

+7.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.43%

4.85%

+11.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.21%

14.53%

+6.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.61%

14.22%

+4.39%

YCS vs. XTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

YCS has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

YCS vs. XTAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither YCS nor XTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


YCS and XTAP have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YCS has higher volatility (5.95%) compared to XTAP (1.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YCS dropped -49.56% vs XTAP's -22.13%.

On 5-year performance, YCS leads with 22.89% vs 10.86% for XTAP. On fees, XTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, YCS has performed better with a 22.89% return vs 10.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for YCS.

YCS and XTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

YCS is categorized as Leveraged Currency, while XTAP is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for YCS and 0.79% for XTAP.

XTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.06 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YCS and XTAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer