YCLO vs. JA
YCLO (Franklin BSP CLO ETF) and JA (Janus Henderson AA-A CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. YCLO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for JA.
Performance
YCLO vs. JA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
YCLO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
JA
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $543.62K | $716.26K | $877.48K | |
| $9.14K | $4.48K | $2.90K |
YCLO vs. JA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
YCLO Franklin BSP CLO ETF | 1.04% |
JA Janus Henderson AA-A CLO ETF | 0.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between YCLO and JA is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2026 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YCLO vs. JA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin BSP CLO ETF (YCLO) and Janus Henderson AA-A CLO ETF (JA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
YCLO vs. JA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YCLO drawdown since its inception was -0.04%, smaller than the maximum JA drawdown of -0.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YCLO and JA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YCLO | JA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.04% | -0.51% | +0.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -0.04% | +0.04% |
Volatility
YCLO vs. JA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YCLO | JA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43% | 1.46% | -1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.43% | 1.46% | -1.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.43% | 1.46% | -1.03% |
YCLO vs. JA - Expense Ratio Comparison
YCLO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than JA's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
YCLO vs. JA - Dividend Comparison
YCLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than JA's 1.71% yield.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
JA Janus Henderson AA-A CLO ETF | 1.71% |
YCLO Franklin BSP CLO ETF | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YCLO and JA have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for YCLO.
JA has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 0.31% for YCLO.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for YCLO and 0.29% for JA.
Find the right allocation for YCLO and JA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer