YBTY vs. LQTI
YBTY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST TopYielders ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YBTY charges 1.38%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.
Performance
YBTY vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YBTY achieves a -16.24% return, which is significantly lower than LQTI's 0.16% return.
YBTY
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- -16.24%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQTI
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- -0.04%
- 1Y
- 5.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YBTY vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TopYielders ETF | -16.24% | -7.96% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 0.16% | 0.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between YBTY and LQTI is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YBTY vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank
YBTY
LQTI
YBTY vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST TopYielders ETF (YBTY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YBTY | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.98 | 0.88 | -2.87 |
Drawdowns
YBTY vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YBTY drawdown since its inception was -27.66%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBTY and LQTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YBTY | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.66% | -3.41% | -24.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.90% | -1.44% | -22.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.36% | -0.88% | -17.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.11% | — |
Volatility
YBTY vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YBTY | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.02% | 5.10% | +16.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.02% | 5.97% | +16.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.02% | 5.97% | +16.05% |
YBTY vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
YBTY has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
YBTY vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison
YBTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.65%, more than LQTI's 9.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 9.11% | 7.01% |
YBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TopYielders ETF | 48.65% | 4.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YBTY and LQTI have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.38% for YBTY.
YBTY has the higher dividend yield at 48.65%, compared with 9.11% for LQTI.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 1.38% for YBTY and 0.65% for LQTI.
Find the right allocation for YBTY and LQTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer