YBTC vs. XBTY

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

YBTC (Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF) and XBTY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Roundhill, while XBTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, YBTC returned -40.21% vs -44.39% for XBTY. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. YBTC charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for XBTY.

Performance

YBTC vs. XBTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YBTC achieves a -23.96% return, which is significantly lower than XBTY's -22.50% return.

YBTC

• 1D: -3.00%
• 1M: 3.48%
• 6M: -20.57%
• YTD: -23.96%
• 1Y: -40.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.99%

XBTY

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 1.12%
• 6M: -16.67%
• YTD: -22.50%
• 1Y: -44.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -33.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
XBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF	$70.68K	$100.72K	$240.24K
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF	$1.21M	$1.11M	$1.55M

YBTC vs. XBTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF	-23.96%	-11.34%
XBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF	-22.50%	-21.19%

Correlation

The correlation between YBTC and XBTY is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2025	0.87

The correlation between YBTC and XBTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

YBTC vs. XBTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

YBTC

YBTC Risk / Return Rank: 1
YBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
YBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
YBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 1
YBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
YBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 1

XBTY

XBTY Risk / Return Rank: 0
XBTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
XBTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
XBTY Omega Ratio Rank: 0
XBTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
XBTY Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

YBTC vs. XBTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	YBTC	XBTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.06	-1.76	+0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.52	-2.75	+1.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	0.68	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.87	-0.97	+0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.35	-1.35	0.00

YBTC vs. XBTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YBTC Sharpe Ratio is -1.06, which is higher than the XBTY Sharpe Ratio of -1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YBTC and XBTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

YBTC vs. XBTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YBTC drawdown since its inception was -48.84%, roughly equal to the maximum XBTY drawdown of -49.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBTC and XBTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	YBTC	XBTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.84%	-49.03%	+0.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.84%	-49.03%	+0.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-44.47%	-47.49%	+3.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.91%	-26.13%	+11.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.35%	34.99%	-3.64%

Volatility

YBTC vs. XBTY - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) has a higher volatility of 7.65% compared to GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY) at 2.14%. This indicates that YBTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YBTC	XBTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.65%	2.14%	+5.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.73%	13.90%	+17.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.25%	26.92%	+13.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.45%	26.42%	+14.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.45%	26.42%	+14.03%

YBTC vs. XBTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

YBTC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than XBTY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

YBTC vs. XBTY - Dividend Comparison

YBTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 80.99%, less than XBTY's 201.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
XBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF	192.49%	102.53%	0.00%
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF	80.99%	76.04%	44.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YBTC and XBTY in my portfolio?

YBTC and XBTY have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, YBTC or XBTY?

YBTC has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to XBTY (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YBTC dropped -48.84% vs XBTY's -49.03%.

Which ETF is better, YBTC or XBTY?

On 1-year performance, YBTC leads with -40.21% vs -44.39% for XBTY. On fees, YBTC is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, XBTY has been the lower-risk option at 2.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, YBTC or XBTY?

Over the 1-year period, YBTC has performed better with a -40.21% return vs -44.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, YBTC or XBTY?

YBTC is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for XBTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, YBTC or XBTY?

XBTY has the higher dividend yield at 192.49%, compared with 80.99% for YBTC.

What is the main difference between YBTC and XBTY?

YBTC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while XBTY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for YBTC and 0.99% for XBTY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

YBTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.06 vs -1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.