PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YBTC vs. XBTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YBTC vs. XBTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YBTC achieves a -24.30% return, which is significantly lower than XBTY's -20.64% return.


YBTC

1D
1.74%
1M
-14.49%
YTD
-24.30%
6M
-24.06%
1Y
-35.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XBTY

1D
1.47%
1M
-6.96%
YTD
-20.64%
6M
-18.65%
1Y
-38.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YBTC vs. XBTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between YBTC and XBTY is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2025

0.88

The correlation between YBTC and XBTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YBTC vs. XBTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YBTC
YBTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
YBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
YBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
YBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
YBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

XBTY
XBTY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
XBTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBTY Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
XBTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBTY Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YBTC vs. XBTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YBTCXBTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

0.76

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

-0.82

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.28

-1.24

-0.04

YBTC vs. XBTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YBTC Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is higher than the XBTY Sharpe Ratio of -1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YBTC and XBTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YBTC vs. XBTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YBTC drawdown since its inception was -48.82%, roughly equal to the maximum XBTY drawdown of -47.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBTC and XBTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YBTCXBTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.82%

-47.01%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.82%

-47.01%

-1.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.72%

-46.23%

+1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.52%

-23.97%

+10.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.54%

31.18%

-3.64%

Volatility

YBTC vs. XBTY - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) has a higher volatility of 12.43% compared to GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY) at 4.96%. This indicates that YBTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YBTCXBTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.43%

4.96%

+7.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.97%

15.68%

+16.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.81%

27.64%

+12.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.90%

27.44%

+13.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.90%

27.44%

+13.46%

YBTC vs. XBTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

YBTC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than XBTY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

YBTC vs. XBTY - Dividend Comparison

YBTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 87.22%, less than XBTY's 223.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
XBTY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF
223.65%102.53%0.00%
YBTC
Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF
87.22%76.04%44.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


YBTC and XBTY have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YBTC has higher volatility (12.43%) compared to XBTY (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YBTC dropped -48.82% vs XBTY's -47.01%.

On 1-year performance, YBTC leads with -35.20% vs -38.54% for XBTY. On fees, YBTC is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, XBTY has been the lower-risk option at 4.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, YBTC has performed better with a -35.20% return vs -38.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

YBTC is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for XBTY.

XBTY has the higher dividend yield at 223.65%, compared with 87.22% for YBTC.

YBTC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while XBTY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for YBTC and 0.99% for XBTY.

YBTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.89 vs -1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YBTC and XBTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer