YBTC vs. SETH

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

YBTC (Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF) and SETH (ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. YBTC is actively managed, while SETH is passively managed. Over the past year, YBTC returned -39.52% vs 27.48% for SETH. Their -0.75 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

YBTC vs. SETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YBTC achieves a -23.08% return, which is significantly lower than SETH's 29.49% return.

YBTC

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: 4.67%
• 6M: -14.64%
• YTD: -23.08%
• 1Y: -39.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.44%

SETH

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -10.05%
• 6M: 5.54%
• YTD: 29.49%
• 1Y: 27.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -31.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF	$1.09M	$1.16M	$1.85M
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF	$1.48M	$1.24M	$1.57M

YBTC vs. SETH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF	-23.08%	-4.23%	55.31%
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF	29.49%	-29.41%	-43.86%

Correlation

The correlation between YBTC and SETH is -0.85, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2024	-0.75

The correlation between YBTC and SETH shifts across timeframes, from -0.85 (1 year) to -0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

YBTC vs. SETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

YBTC

YBTC Risk / Return Rank: 2
YBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
YBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
YBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
YBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
YBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 3

SETH

SETH Risk / Return Rank: 24
SETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
SETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
SETH Omega Ratio Rank: 25
SETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
SETH Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

YBTC vs. SETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	YBTC	SETH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.99	0.41	-1.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.38	1.00	-2.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	1.12	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.81	0.93	-1.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.26	1.60	-2.85

YBTC vs. SETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YBTC Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is lower than the SETH Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YBTC and SETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

YBTC vs. SETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YBTC drawdown since its inception was -48.84%, smaller than the maximum SETH drawdown of -80.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBTC and SETH.

Drawdown Indicators

	YBTC	SETH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.84%	-80.74%	+31.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.84%	-29.71%	-19.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.83%	-64.43%	+20.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.95%	-55.12%	+40.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.47%	17.71%	+13.76%

Volatility

YBTC vs. SETH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) is 7.36%, while ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) has a volatility of 12.55%. This indicates that YBTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YBTC	SETH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.36%	12.55%	-5.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.73%	45.56%	-13.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.20%	67.05%	-26.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.43%	68.84%	-28.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.43%	68.84%	-28.41%

YBTC vs. SETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both YBTC and SETH have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

YBTC vs. SETH - Dividend Comparison

YBTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 80.06%, more than SETH's 22.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF	22.11%	7.01%	3.44%	0.38%
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF	80.06%	76.04%	44.53%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YBTC and SETH in my portfolio?

YBTC and SETH have a correlation of -0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, YBTC or SETH?

SETH has higher volatility (12.55%) compared to YBTC (7.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YBTC dropped -48.84% vs SETH's -80.74%.

Which ETF is better, YBTC or SETH?

On 1-year performance, SETH leads with 27.48% vs -39.52% for YBTC. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, YBTC has been the lower-risk option at 7.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, YBTC or SETH?

Over the 1-year period, SETH has performed better with a 27.48% return vs -39.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, YBTC or SETH?

YBTC and SETH have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, YBTC or SETH?

YBTC has the higher dividend yield at 80.06%, compared with 22.11% for SETH.

What is the main difference between YBTC and SETH?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and ProShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.41 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.