YBTC vs. SBIT

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

YBTC (Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. YBTC is actively managed, while SBIT is passively managed. Over the past year, YBTC returned -36.84% vs 72.40% for SBIT. At a correlation of -0.89, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

YBTC vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YBTC achieves a -25.51% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 44.52% return.

YBTC

• 1D: -2.77%
• 1M: -19.76%
• YTD: -25.51%
• 6M: -28.64%
• 1Y: -36.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SBIT

• 1D: 5.47%
• 1M: 61.07%
• YTD: 44.52%
• 6M: 59.37%
• 1Y: 72.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YBTC vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF	-25.51%	-4.23%	25.17%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	44.52%	-25.11%	-73.13%

Correlation

The correlation between YBTC and SBIT is -0.93, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024	-0.89

The correlation between YBTC and SBIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.93 to -0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

YBTC vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YBTC

YBTC Risk / Return Rank: 2
YBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
YBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
YBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
YBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
YBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

SBIT

SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 28
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 29
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YBTC vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	YBTC	SBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.94	0.83	-1.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.27	1.58	-2.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	1.19	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.78	1.52	-2.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.43	2.94	-4.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

YBTC vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YBTC Sharpe Ratio is -0.94, which is lower than the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YBTC and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	YBTC	SBIT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.94	0.83	-1.78
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	-0.45	+0.58

Drawdowns

YBTC vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YBTC drawdown since its inception was -47.09%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBTC and SBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	YBTC	SBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.09%	-91.35%	+44.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.09%	-47.94%	+0.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.60%	-77.07%	+31.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.94%	-68.56%	+55.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.85%	24.71%	+1.14%

Volatility

YBTC vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) is 8.73%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 17.43%. This indicates that YBTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YBTC	SBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.73%	17.43%	-8.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.30%	67.15%	-35.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.25%	87.25%	-48.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.82%	97.45%	-56.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.82%	97.45%	-56.63%

YBTC vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both YBTC and SBIT have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

YBTC vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

YBTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 90.64%, more than SBIT's 3.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	3.25%	0.52%	1.00%
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF	90.64%	76.04%	44.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YBTC and SBIT in my portfolio?

YBTC and SBIT have a correlation of -0.93, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, YBTC or SBIT?

SBIT has higher volatility (17.43%) compared to YBTC (8.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YBTC dropped -47.09% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

Which ETF is better, YBTC or SBIT?

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 72.40% vs -36.84% for YBTC. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, YBTC has been the lower-risk option at 8.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, YBTC or SBIT?

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 72.40% return vs -36.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, YBTC or SBIT?

YBTC and SBIT have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, YBTC or SBIT?

YBTC has the higher dividend yield at 90.64%, compared with 3.25% for SBIT.

What is the main difference between YBTC and SBIT?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and ProShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.