PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YBTC vs. GPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YBTC vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YBTC achieves a -24.91% return, which is significantly lower than GPIX's 8.64% return.


YBTC

1D
0.37%
1M
-18.77%
YTD
-24.91%
6M
-26.59%
1Y
-37.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GPIX

1D
0.55%
1M
0.31%
YTD
8.64%
6M
9.22%
1Y
22.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YBTC vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
YBTC
Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF
-24.91%-4.23%55.31%
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
8.64%16.25%22.22%

Correlation

The correlation between YBTC and GPIX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2024

0.41

The correlation between YBTC and GPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.41 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YBTC vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YBTC
YBTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
YBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
YBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
YBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
YBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

GPIX
GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YBTC vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YBTCGPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.41

-0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.77

2.97

-3.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.40

14.51

-15.92

YBTC vs. GPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YBTC Sharpe Ratio is -0.95, which is lower than the GPIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YBTC and GPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YBTC vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YBTC drawdown since its inception was -48.82%, which is greater than GPIX's maximum drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBTC and GPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YBTCGPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.82%

-17.50%

-31.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.82%

-7.71%

-41.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.17%

-1.63%

-43.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.27%

-1.49%

-11.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.82%

1.57%

+25.25%

Volatility

YBTC vs. GPIX - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) has a higher volatility of 12.36% compared to Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) at 3.77%. This indicates that YBTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YBTCGPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.36%

3.77%

+8.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.05%

8.51%

+23.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.81%

10.62%

+29.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.99%

13.86%

+27.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.99%

13.86%

+27.13%

YBTC vs. GPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

YBTC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

YBTC vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison

YBTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 87.71%, more than GPIX's 8.09% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
8.09%8.01%7.45%1.40%
YBTC
Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF
87.71%76.04%44.53%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YBTC and GPIX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YBTC has higher volatility (12.36%) compared to GPIX (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YBTC dropped -48.82% vs GPIX's -17.50%.

On 1-year performance, GPIX leads with 22.76% vs -37.59% for YBTC. On fees, GPIX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, GPIX has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GPIX has performed better with a 22.76% return vs -37.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GPIX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for YBTC.

YBTC has the higher dividend yield at 87.71%, compared with 8.09% for GPIX.

YBTC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while GPIX is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for YBTC and 0.29% for GPIX.

GPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YBTC and GPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer