PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YBTC vs. BTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YBTC vs. BTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) and Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YBTC achieves a -23.39% return, which is significantly higher than BTC's -25.36% return.


YBTC

1D
-2.77%
1M
-16.32%
YTD
-23.39%
6M
-26.70%
1Y
-35.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BTC

1D
-2.73%
1M
-18.40%
YTD
-25.36%
6M
-29.74%
1Y
-38.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YBTC vs. BTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
YBTC
Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF
-23.39%-4.23%22.98%
BTC
Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF
-25.36%-7.50%44.64%

Correlation

The correlation between YBTC and BTC is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2024

0.91

The correlation between YBTC and BTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YBTC vs. BTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YBTC
YBTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
YBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
YBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
YBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
YBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

BTC
BTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YBTC vs. BTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) and Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YBTCBTCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

0.86

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

-0.78

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.39

-1.36

-0.03

YBTC vs. BTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YBTC Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is comparable to the BTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YBTC and BTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YBTCBTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.91

-0.89

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

-0.00

+0.16

Drawdowns

YBTC vs. BTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YBTC drawdown since its inception was -47.09%, roughly equal to the maximum BTC drawdown of -49.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBTC and BTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YBTCBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.09%

-49.34%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.09%

-49.34%

+2.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.06%

-47.98%

+3.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.89%

-16.61%

+3.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.69%

28.38%

-2.69%

Volatility

YBTC vs. BTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) is 8.85%, while Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC) has a volatility of 9.40%. This indicates that YBTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YBTCBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.85%

9.40%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.81%

34.45%

-2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.20%

43.69%

-4.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.81%

48.30%

-7.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.81%

48.30%

-7.49%

YBTC vs. BTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

YBTC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BTC's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

YBTC vs. BTC - Dividend Comparison

YBTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.13%, while BTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
BTC
Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
YBTC
Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF
88.13%76.04%44.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, YBTC and BTC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BTC has higher volatility (9.40%) compared to YBTC (8.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YBTC dropped -47.09% vs BTC's -49.34%.

On 1-year performance, YBTC leads with -35.71% vs -38.61% for BTC. On fees, BTC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, YBTC has been the lower-risk option at 8.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, YBTC has performed better with a -35.71% return vs -38.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BTC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for YBTC.

YBTC has the higher dividend yield at 88.13%, compared with 0.00% for BTC.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for YBTC and 0.15% for BTC.

BTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.89 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YBTC and BTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer