YBIT vs. EZBC
YBIT (YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF) and EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. YBIT is actively managed, while EZBC is passively managed. Over the past year, YBIT returned -35.27% vs -38.68% for EZBC. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. YBIT charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZBC.
Performance
YBIT vs. EZBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with YBIT having a -24.59% return and EZBC slightly lower at -25.36%.
YBIT
- 1D
- -2.50%
- 1M
- -15.67%
- YTD
- -24.59%
- 6M
- -27.08%
- 1Y
- -35.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZBC
- 1D
- -2.73%
- 1M
- -18.42%
- YTD
- -25.36%
- 6M
- -29.82%
- 1Y
- -38.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YBIT vs. EZBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
YBIT YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF | -24.59% | -2.49% | -0.09% |
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF | -25.36% | -6.56% | 40.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between YBIT and EZBC is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2024 | 0.92 |
The correlation between YBIT and EZBC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YBIT vs. EZBC — Risk / Return Rank
YBIT
EZBC
YBIT vs. EZBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF (YBIT) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YBIT | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 0.86 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | -0.79 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | -1.36 | -0.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YBIT | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.98 | -0.89 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.35 | 0.30 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
YBIT vs. EZBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YBIT drawdown since its inception was -45.54%, smaller than the maximum EZBC drawdown of -49.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBIT and EZBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YBIT | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.54% | -49.37% | +3.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.54% | -49.37% | +3.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.10% | -48.04% | +4.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.12% | -16.01% | +0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.69% | 28.42% | -3.73% |
Volatility
YBIT vs. EZBC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF (YBIT) is 7.77%, while Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) has a volatility of 9.43%. This indicates that YBIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YBIT | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.77% | 9.43% | -1.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.10% | 34.44% | -5.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.10% | 43.67% | -7.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.63% | 50.06% | -11.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.63% | 50.06% | -11.43% |
YBIT vs. EZBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
YBIT has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than EZBC's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
YBIT vs. EZBC - Dividend Comparison
YBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 101.02%, while EZBC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YBIT YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF | 101.02% | 88.33% | 60.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, YBIT and EZBC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EZBC has higher volatility (9.43%) compared to YBIT (7.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YBIT dropped -45.54% vs EZBC's -49.37%.
On 1-year performance, YBIT leads with -35.27% vs -38.68% for EZBC. On fees, EZBC is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, YBIT has been the lower-risk option at 7.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, YBIT has performed better with a -35.27% return vs -38.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EZBC is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for YBIT.
YBIT has the higher dividend yield at 101.02%, compared with 0.00% for EZBC.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for YBIT and 0.19% for EZBC.
EZBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.89 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YBIT and EZBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer